Effectiveness of design procedures for linear TMD installed on inelastic structures under pulse-like ground motion
Abstract
Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) have been frequently proposed to mitigate the detrimental effects of dynamic loadings in structural systems. The effectiveness of this protection strategy has been demonstrated for wind-induced vibrations and, to some extent, for seismic loadings. Within this framework, recent numerical studies have shown that beneficial effects can be achieved by placing a linear TMD on the roof of linear elastic structural systems subjected to pulse-like ground motions. Motivated by these positive outcomes, closed-form design formulations have been also proposed to optimize the device's parameters. For structural systems that undergo a near-fault pulse-like ground motion, however, it is unlikely that their dynamic response be linear elastic. Hence, it is very important to understand whether such strategy is effective for inelastic structural systems. In order to provide new useful insights about this issue, the paper presents statistical results obtained from a numerical study conducted for three shear-type hysteretic (softening-type) systems having 4, 8 and 16 stories equipped with a linear elastic TMD. The effectiveness of two design procedures is discussed by examining the performances of the protected systems subjected to 124 natural pulse-like earthquakes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible to use pulses in lieu of real ground motions to measure the behavior of the structure-STMD (or TMD) dynamic system under pulse-like ground motions.
“Therefore, this provides possibility of using pulses in lieu of real ground motions to measure the behavior of the structure-STMD (or TMD) dynamic system under pulselike ground motions [94].”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as [94]
Cites
Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas
Hoang, N., Fujino, Y., & Warnitchai, P. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Seismic effectiveness of hysteretic tuned mass dampers for inelastic structures
Boccamazzo, A., Carboni, B., Quaranta, G., & Lacarbonara, W. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110591 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Quaranta, G., Mollaioli, F., & Monti, G.
- Venue
- Earthquakes and Structures
- Publisher
- Techno-Press
- Published
- 2016-01-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 239-260
- ISSN
- 2092-7614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2274105337
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earthquakes and Structures (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Keywords
- tuned mass damper, pulse-like ground motion, near-fault earthquakes, inelastic structures, seismic response mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review