Liquid Air Energy Storage System. Study of Air Liquefaction Characteristics Using a Concrete-Type Cool Storage Unit.
Open accessAbstract
Technical feasibility of the concrete-type cool storage unit used for the liquid air energy storage system was evaluated. The blending composition for cool storage material was selected as Portland blast furnace cement+sand+air entraining low-water agent+steel fiber. Thermal conductivity was about 20% higher than regular concrete and stainless fiber concrete. Material cost was lower than that of stainless fiber concrete. The liquefaction examination was performed for conditions assuming an actual plant with the concrete-type cool storage unit. If enough insulated treatment was given, the prospect was obtained for a stable liquefaction rate of 70% or more.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After one additional paper in 1982 by Dooley et al., no documents regarding liquid air as energy storage were published until 1998 in Japan by Mitsubishi-Hitachi, with no further developments after 2002.
“After one additional paper was published in 1982 by Dooley et al. [25], no documents regarding liquid air as energy storage were published until the year 1998 in Japan by Mitsubishi-Hitachi [26][27][28][29][30][31], with no further developments after 2002.”
From Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
The title and author affiliation (p. 1) identify this as a 2002 Japanese liquid-air energy-storage study conducted at Hitachi, and the references (p. 7) include related Japanese papers from 1998. The paper does not establish that nothing was published between 1982 and 1998, attribute the 1998 work to Mitsubishi-Hitachi, or address developments after 2002. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis
Borri, E., Tafone, A., Zsembinszki, G., Comodi, G., Romagnoli, A., & Cabeza, L. F. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082773 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- KITOU, K., FUJII, T., SHIINA, K., & CHINO, K.
- Venue
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series B
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 674
- Pages
- 2870-2876
- ISSN
- 0387-5016 (ISSN-L)
- 1884-8346
- OpenAlex
- W369298845
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS Series B (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Keywords
- liquid air energy storage, air liquefaction, steel fibers, air-entraining agents, thermal conductivity, liquefaction rate, material costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
