Cited by 11Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Completed Suicide in Children and Adolescents: A Review

Hoberman, Harry M.·1989·Residential Treatment For Children & Youth

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j007v07n01_04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in affect and impulse management as well as poor problem-solving skills were revealed in a review of completed adolescent suicides.

    “A review of completed adolescent suicides by Hoberman (1989) revealed deficits in affect and impulse management as well as poor problem-solving skills.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hoberman, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hoberman, Harry M.
Venue
Residential Treatment For Children & Youth
Published
1989-11-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
61-88
ISSN
  • 0886-571X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0358
OpenAlex
W1601979782
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Residential Treatment for Children & Youth (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicide mortality, child suicide, adolescent suicide, suicide prevention, residential treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review