The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in Characteristics of Online versus Traditional Students: Implications for Target Marketing
Abstract
This study provides insight for educators and administrators into differences between students enrolled in Web-based and traditional classes as online learning enters the growth stage of its product life cycle. We identify characteristics that differentiate online students from those who prefer traditional education methods in order to offer more effective marketing techniques for attracting and retaining online students. Results of the study suggest that students in traditional classes have higher perceptions of performance and financial risk than their online counterparts. Social character was another important factor determining the choice of traditional over online learning. Recommendations to assist administrators in increasing enrollment in their online programs are presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sample drawn from a single group of undergraduate students in Italy and an online university limits the generalizability of the findings to other student populations.
“our sample was drawn from a single group of undergraduate students within one cultural context (Italy) and the specific setting of an online university, with students that may differ from those in traditional university environment (Pentina and Neeley, 2007). This unique composition may limit the generalizability of our findings to other student populations.”
From Risk and protective factors in academic burnout: exploring the mediating role of interpersonal emotion regulation in the link with social support (2025) · cites this paper as Pentina and Neeley, 2007
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Bauer R. A., 1960, Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World
- Bearden W. O., 1993, Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research
- 10.2307/1252221 · DOI
- 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.245-253 · DOI
- 10.1300/J050v14n01_06 · DOI
- Clark M., 2000, The Guardian On-line, 9, 2
- Clayton, M. A. Who's Online? A Look at Demographics of Online Student Populations. Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the Americas. Mexico.: Pueblo.
- 10.2307/1251915 · DOI
- 10.1080/08832329809601663 · DOI
- Gibson C. C., 1992, Journal of Distance Education, 7, 39
- 10.1108/EUM0000000005657 · DOI
- Hazel R., 1991, Research in Distance Education, 3, 2
- 10.1086/209073 · DOI
- 10.2307/1252069 · DOI
- 10.2307/2786125 · DOI
- Kriger T. J., 2001, Report for American Federation of Teachers.
- 10.1300/J050v11n03_01 · DOI
- Leavitt C., 1975, Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 545
- 10.2307/1980645 · DOI
- Liviertos B., 1996, Alternative Learning Modes: Spring '92 Tele-Course and Weekend College Enrollees
- Lumpkin J. R., 1982, Journal of Advertising, 11, 56, 10.1080/00913367.1982.10672822 · DOI
- 2001, “Projections of Education Statistics to 2011. Chapter 2: Enrollment in Degree-Granting Institutions.”
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- O'Donoghue J., 2002, ALN Magazine, 4, 10
- Prahalad C. K., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 68, 79
- Riesman D., 1950, The Lonely Crowd
- Robbins S. P., 2001, Organizational Behavior
- Robinson R., 1992, Research in Distance Education, 4, 10
- Rogers E. M., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations,
- Schiffman L. G., 2000, Consumer Behavior,
- 10.1086/208894 · DOI
- Singh P., 2004, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 1
- Slaughter S., 1997, Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University
- Sloan Survey of Online Learning. Entering the Mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Sloan-C International Conference.
- 10.1300/J050v13n01_07 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Messina, I., Rossi, T., Maniglio, R., Loconsole, C., & Spataro, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1536951 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Pentina, I., & Neeley, C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Central Michigan University (US)
- ORCID
- Pentina, Iryna
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing for Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-65
- ISSN
- 0884-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7144
- OpenAlex
- W2069178047
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
- Keywords
- online learning, student characteristics, targeted marketing, higher education marketing, student retention, perceived performance, financial risk perception, social character
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review