Market Segmentation by Motivations to Travel: British Tourists Visiting Turkey
Abstract
Knowledge about tourist motivations would enable tourism destination planners to better satisfy consumer needs. Recent studies evidence the heterogeneous nature of tourist motivations, and highlight the importance of motivations (e.g., Bansal & Eiselt, 2004). The context-dependency of motivations to specific destinations and tourist market emphasizes the need of further research. The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, to explore the primary reasons influencing British tourists' decision making while taking a summer holiday in two resorts (Fethiye and Marmaris), located in Mugla (Turkey), and second, to identify customer segments, depending on their socio-demographic characteristics and holiday-taking patterns. On the basis of multi-step cluster analysis, five segments were found: fuzzy tourists, recreational-type, active, escape seekers and relax-quiet tourists. Managerial implications and further research are also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An individual's evaluation of destination attributes may vary depending on his/her motivational state.
“However, research also suggests an individual's evaluation of destination attributes may vary depending on his/her motivational state (Andreu, Kozak, Avci & Cifter, 2005).”
From The impact of tourism mini-movies on destination image: The influence of travel motivation and advertising disclosure (2017) · cites this paper as Andreu, Kozak, Avci & Cifter, 2005
Cites
Motivations for pleasure vacation
Crompton, J. L. (1979) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/0160-7383(79)90004-5 · Cited by 3,534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gong, T., & Tung, V. W. S. (2017) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2016.1182458 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Andreu, L., Kozak, M., Avci, N., & Cifter, N.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de València (ES)
- Muğla University (TR)
- School of Tourism and Hotel Management, Ege University
- Venue
- Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1054-8408 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7306
- OpenAlex
- W1520957277
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
- Keywords
- tourist motivation, market segmentation, British tourists, tourist decision-making, summer vacation, resort tourism, Fethiye, Marmaris, sociodemographic factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review