Cited by 80Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Adolescents’ Preferences for Substance Abuse Screening in Primary Care Practice

Knight, John R., Harris, Sion K., Sherritt, Lon, Van Hook, Shari, Lawrence, Nohelani, Brooks, Traci, Carey, Peggy, Kossack, Robert +1 more·2007·Substance Abuse

Abstract

Objective: To assess adolescents’ preferences for substance abuse screening in primary medical care settings. Design/Methods: Twelve- to 18-year-old patients (N = 2133) arriving for routine care at a network of primary care sites completed an interview that included demographic items, the CRAFFT screen, and a questionnaire assessing preferences for screening method (paper questionnaire, computer, oral interview by nurse or doctor). A subgroup (n = 222) completed the CRAFFT directly on the computer. Results: Across the entire sample, paper was the screening administration method most preferred (mean rank (MR) = 2.92, 95%CI 2.87–2.96) vs. computer (MR = 2.38, 2.33–2.43), nurse (MR = 2.43, 2.39–2.47), and doctor (MR = 2.30, 2.25–2.35). Among the participants who received the screening on the computer, however, computer (MR = 3.08, 95%CI 2.42–2.52) was statistically tied with paper (MR = 2.88, 2.75–3.02) and both were ranked significantly higher than nurse (MR = 2.06, 1.94–2.17) and doctor (MR = 1.98, 1.82–2.14). The findings were similar for participants’ reports of being “very likely” to be honest when answering substance abuse screening questions. Conclusions: Adolescents should ideally be screened for substance abuse using paper or computer questionnaires.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j465v28n04_03

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knight, J. R., Harris, S. K., Sherritt, L., Van Hook, S., Lawrence, N., Brooks, T., Carey, P., Kossack, R., & Kulig, J.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Adolescent Substance Abuse Research, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Fallon Clinic, Worcester, MA, USA
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Knight, John R.
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2007-11
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
107-117
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W1975681925
Cited by
80
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 40 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (5T20 MC 00011-06, 5T71 MC00009-12 0)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K07AA013280)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
primary care, paper-based questionnaires, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review