Agenda Setting and African American Women in State Legislatures
Abstract
SUMMARY Political scientists have, in recent years, uncovered substantial evidence that political representation in the United States is influenced by gender and race, yet generally examine the effects of gender entirely separate from the effects of race. In this article, we explore the agenda-setting behavior of African American female state legislators. We find that African American women do respond to both women's interests and black interests. We also find that while the sponsorship of black interest measures by African American women (or other legislators) is not influenced by the proportion of African Americans within the chamber, African American women are less likely to sponsor women's interest measures in legislatures with a relatively high proportion of women present. We conclude that because of their focus on multiple groups, black women occupy a unique place in representation, and that their choices are influenced by the institutional context in which they work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510 · see citing works
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns
Ward, O. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161216673195 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bratton, K. A., Haynie, K. L., & Reingold, B.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Emory University (US)
- ORCID
- Reingold, Beth
- Venue
- Journal of Women, Politics & Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-08-29
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 71-96
- ISSN
- 0195-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-477X
- 1554-4788
- OpenAlex
- W2026352955
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Women Politics & Policy (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- agenda setting, African American women, state legislatures, women legislators, Black legislators, gender and race intersection, legislative sponsorship, political representation, institutional environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review