The DOI matches its DataCite record.
HCI Guidelines for Gender Equity and Inclusivity
Abstract
https://www.morgan-klaus.com/gender-guidelines.html
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To accurately reflect the gender identity of each participant and follow best-practices for gender inclusivity in research as noted by [88, 106], we asked individuals to self-identify their gender in an open response question during the interviews.”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cited by
A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges
Liang, J. T., Yang, C., & Myers, B. A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17125 · Cited by 206
A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges
Liang, J. T., Yang, C., & Myers, B. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3608128 · Cited by 203
Winkle, K., McMillan, D., Arnelid, M., Harrison, K., Balaam, M., Johnson, E., & Leite, I. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576973 · Cited by 111
Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software
Frluckaj, H., Stevens, N., Howison, J., & Dabbish, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687047 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Scheuerman, M. K., Spiel, K., Haimson, O. L., Hamidi, F., & Branham, S. M.
- Venue
- Maryland Shared Open Access Repository
- Publisher
- Maryland Shared Open Access Repository
- Published
- 2020
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review