Artificial intelligence applications and scholarly publication in orthopaedic surgery*
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The International Committee of Medical Journal editors forbids researchers from listing ChatGPT as a co-author.
“Some academic journal publishers have updated their submission guidelines, for example, the International Committee of Medical Journal editors forbids researchers from listing ChatGPT as a co-author (Leopold et al., 2023), while many others still lack specific regulations in this regard.”
From Widen the debate: What is the academic community’s perception on ChatGPT? (2024) · cites this paper as Leopold et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?
O’Connor, S., & ChatGPT (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Flanagin, A., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Berkwits, M., & Christiansen, S. L. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Rosenberg, A., Walker, J., Griffiths, S., & Jenkins, R. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1524 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- No authors listed. Defining the role of authors and contributors. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. https://www. icmje.org/recommendations/ browse/roles-and-responsibilities/ defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (date last accessed 15 March 2023).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT applications in Academic Research: A Review of Benefits, Concerns, and Recommendations
AlZaabi, A., ALAmri, A., Albalushi, H., Aljabri, R., & AalAbdulsalam, A. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.17.553688 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Widen the debate: What is the academic community’s perception on ChatGPT?
Jiang, Y., Xie, L., Lin, G., & Mo, F. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12677-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leopold, S. S., Haddad, F. S., Sandell, L. J., & Swiontkowski, M.
- Affiliations
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (US)
- The Bone & Joint Journal , London, UK
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research , St Louis, Missouri, USA
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery , Needham, Massachusetts, USA
- Venue
- The Bone & Joint Journal
- Published
- 2023-04-17
- Volume
- 105-B
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 585-586
- ISSN
- 2049-4394 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-4408
- OpenAlex
- W4378952987
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Bone & Joint Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, orthopedic surgery, scholarly publishing, research applications
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Orthopedics, Orthopedic Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
