The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LOW-ANGLE FIXATION IN FRACTURES OF THE FEMORAL NECK
Abstract
The successful management of femoral neck fractures is obviously based upon many factors. The forces acting upon the proximal end of the femur are believed to be mainly compressive in nature, and the low-angle nail by stabilising the fully reduced fracture in the line of these forces is held to allow weight bearing to take place. Low-angle nailing is believed to offer many advantages over conventional methods of treatment but only in the presence of stability. Stable reduction is the essential preliminary to any form of treatment, and low-angle fixation with early weight bearing in the absence of stability is regarded as futile. It is suggested that those subcapital separations which follow trivial injury may originate as stress fractures accompanying the process of bone remodelling in the aged, and that many of these fractures may remain unrecognised and heal spontaneously. With rare exceptions, subcapital fractures are regarded as being of the same essential pattern, and their varying radiological appearance is considered to be due to the different degrees of displacement to which they have been subjected. A new classification based on this premise has been suggested. In a series of eighty subcapital fractures the incidence of avascular necrosis was not adversely affected by early weight bearing, but reduction in the extreme valgus position was invariably followed by this disaster. This is probably also true of any malposition in extreme rotation which must stretch and obliterate the vessels in the ligamentum teres. A rough alignment index of reduction was found to provide an almost infallible guide to the prognosis both in regard to union and to avascular change. It may therefore be possible to base prognosis on the quality of reduction before the fixation appliance has been inserted. The unsatisfactory results in those cases apparently destined to non-union or avascular necrosis may then be avoided by alternative means of treatment at an early stage. Whether this will prove to be true must depend upon a much longer experience of low-angle fixation, and, in common with almost every communication on this subject, premature publication must largely offset the value of the present findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nauth, A., Creek, A. T., Zellar, A., Lawendy, A.-R., Dowrick, A., Gupta, A., Dadi, A., van Kampen, A., Yee, A., de Vries, A. C., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30066-1 · Cited by 319
Tidermark, J., Ponzer, S., Carlsson, P., Söderqvist, A., Brismar, K., Tengstrand, B., & Cederholm, T. (2004) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.006 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Garden, R. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 1961-11
- Volume
- 43-B
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 647-663
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2169670692
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LOW-ANGLE FIXATION IN FRACTURES OF THE FEMORAL NECK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.43b4.647
- The paper
- Garden, R. S. (1961). LOW-ANGLE FIXATION IN FRACTURES OF THE FEMORAL NECK. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.43b4.647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.