The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures
Abstract
A total of 45 tibial shaft fractures, all conservatively treated and with union delayed for more than 16 but less than 32 weeks were entered in a double-blind multi-centre trial. The fractures were selected for their liability to delayed union by the presence of moderate or severe displacement, angulation or comminution or a compound lesion with moderate or severe injury to skin and soft tissues. Treatment was by plaster immobilisation in all, with active electromagnetic stimulation units in 20 patients and dummy control units in 25 patients for 12 weeks. Radiographs were assessed blindly and independently by a radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon. Statistical analysis showed the treatment groups to be comparable except in their age distribution, but age was not found to affect the outcome and the effect of treatment was consistent for each age group. The radiologist's assessment of the active group showed radiological union in five fractures, progress to union in five but no progress to union in 10. In the control group there was union in one fracture and progress towards union in one but no progress in 23. Using Fisher's exact test, the results were very significantly in favour of the active group (p = 0.002). The orthopaedic surgeon's assessment showed union in nine fractures and absence of union in 11 fractures in the active group. There was union in three fractures and absence of union in 22 fractures in the control group. These results were also significantly in favour of the active group (p = 0.02). It was concluded that pulsed electromagnetic fields significantly influence healing in tibial fractures with delayed union.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enhancement of fracture-healing.
Einhorn, T. A. (1995) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199506000-00016 · Cited by 772
The Biofield Hypothesis: Its Biophysical Basis and Role in Medicine
Rubik, B. (2002) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/10755530260511711 · Cited by 437
Electromagnetic effects—From cell biology to medicine
Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., & Özkucur, N. (2009) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001 · Cited by 423
Bone Repair Techniques, Bone Graft, and Bone Graft Substitutes
Perry, C. R. (1999) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199903000-00010 · Cited by 332
Treatment of Nonunions With Electric and Electromagnetic Fields
Aaron, R. K., Ciombor, D. M., & Simon, B. J. (2004) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-200402000-00005 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharrard, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 72-B
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-355
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2118675810
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.72b3.2187877
- The paper
- Sharrard, W. (1990). A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.72b3.2187877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.