The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial
Abstract
We have studied the characteristics of bone ingrowth of a new porous tantalum biomaterial in a simple transcortical canine model using cylindrical implants 5 × 10 mm in size. The material was 75% to 80% porous by volume and had a repeating arrangement of slender interconnecting struts which formed a regular array of dodecahedron-shaped pores. We performed histological studies on two types of material, one with a smaller pore size averaging 430 μm at 4, 16 and 52 weeks and the other with a larger pore size averaging 650 μm at 2, 3, 4, 16 and 52 weeks. Mechanical push-out tests at 4 and 16 weeks were used to assess the shear strength of the bone-implant interface on implants of the smaller pore size. The extent of filling of the pores of the tantalum material with new bone increased from 13% at two weeks to between 42% and 53% at four weeks. By 16 and 52 weeks the average extent of bone ingrowth ranged from 63% to 80%. The tissue response to the small and large pore sizes was similar, with regions of contact between bone and implant increasing with time and with evidence of Haversian remodelling within the pores at later periods. Mechanical tests at four weeks indicated a minimum shear fixation strength of 18.5 MPa, substantially higher than has been obtained with other porous materials with less volumetric porosity. This porous tantalum biomaterial has desirable characteristics for bone ingrowth; further studies are warranted to ascertain its potential for clinical reconstructive orthopaedics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of new metallic alloys for biomedical applications
Niinomi, M., Nakai, M., & Hieda, J. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.037 · Cited by 1,623
Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration
García-Gareta, E., Coathup, M. J., & Blunn, G. W. (2015) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.007 · Cited by 649
Arabnejad, S., Burnett Johnston, R., Pura, J. A., Singh, B., Tanzer, M., & Pasini, D. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 · Cited by 578
Self-citation(2018) · PubMed Central · Cited by 365
The elements of life and medicines
Chellan, P., & Sadler, P. J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0182 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Bobyn, J. D., Stackpool, G. J., Hacking, S. A., Tanzer, M., & Krygier, J. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 81-B
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 907-914
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2081554679
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.0810907
- The paper
- Bobyn, J. D., Stackpool, G. J., Hacking, S. A., Tanzer, M., & Krygier, J. J. (1999). Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.0810907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.