The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year.
Teachers' Preparation to Teach English Language Learners (ELLs): An Investigation of Perceptions, Preparation, and Current Practices
Open accessAbstract
This qualitative case study examined the perceptions of 79 elementary teachers regarding their preparation to teach students learning English as a second language (ELLs). The focus of this inquiry centered on factors related to the preparation of teachers for serving non-native English speaking students. The research questions that guided this study are: (a) What are teachers’ perceptions of their preparation for teaching English learners?; (b) What types of preparatory experiences do teachers perceive as supportive of their preparation for teaching ELLs?; and (c) How do teachers’ perceptions of their preparation shape their practices with ELL students? Findings of this study indicated that most participating teachers perceived that they were not prepared by their teacher education programs for teaching ELL students. Many participants related that they lacked preparatory coursework that included strategies for teaching ELLs, had few observational experiences in classrooms with ELL students, and lacked experiences in working with ELLs during field placements and student teaching. Teachers related that coursework in ESL methods, classroom observations and fieldwork placements in classrooms with ELLs, and hands-on experiences would benefit teachers’ knowledge and skill development for teaching ELLs. Further, teachers’ current classroom practices were consistent with their perceptions of their preparation for teaching ELLs. Focal teachers with perceptions of lower levels of preparation rarely provided alternative forms of assessment, ensured that ELLs comprehended directions, or implemented scaffolding during instruction for ELLs. The focal teacher who perceived that she was extremely well prepared by her teacher education program for teaching ELLs often modeled learning tasks, utilized varied strategies to facilitate comprehensible input, and provided options for alternative assessments for her ELL students. Teacher educators are encouraged to re-examine their pre-service course objectives and content to ensure that teacher candidates are provided with the knowledge and skills to teach non-native English speaking students. In addition, opportunities for classroom observations and field placements in school contexts with linguistically diverse students are encouraged for all teacher candidates. School administrators are encouraged to provide professional development opportunities that include strategies for teaching ELLs. This study provides additional evidence that classroom teachers may not be adequately prepared by their teacher preparatory programs for meeting the literacy and learning needs of ELL students. Providing teachers with strategies and experiences related to ELL students will enable teachers to meet the language and literacy needs of their non-native English speaking students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that both preservice and in-service teachers in the U.S. context feel unprepared to teach emergent bilinguals in their classrooms (Correll, 2016; DarlingHammond et al., 2002)”
From "We Want Them All to Speak in English … So, no Spanish": Preservice Teachers’ Language Ideologies Towards Emergent Bilinguals (2023) · cites this paper as Correll, 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anyichie, A. C., Butler, D. L., Perry, N. E., & Nashon, S. M. (2023) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v11i1.1115 · Cited by 79
Cantrell, S. C., Sampson, S. O., Perry, K. H., & Robershaw, K. L. (2022) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2022.2130117 · Cited by 36
Maharajh, L. R., & Chilli, B. (2021) · Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal · doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2021.0476 · Cited by 6
Learning to Teach English Language Learners as “a Side Note”
Li, G., Bian, Y., & Hinestroza, J. M. (2019) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-9348-5.ch005 · Cited by 3
Academic language proficiency of student teachers in a Namibian University
Shingenge, F. N. (2024) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1411 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Correll, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Correll, Pamela K.
- Venue
- University of Kentucky
- Publisher
- University of Kentucky
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W2595596316
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- English language learners, teacher preparation, initial teacher education, primary school teachers, teacher perceptions, practicum, classroom observation, scaffolding, comprehensible input, alternative assessment, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teachers' Preparation to Teach English Language Learners (ELLs): An Investigation of Perceptions, Preparation, and Current Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13023/etd.2016.531
- The paper
- Correll, P. K. (2016). Teachers' Preparation to Teach English Language Learners (ELLs): An Investigation of Perceptions, Preparation, and Current Practices. University of Kentucky. https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2016.531