Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE ENERGY BALANCE OF CORN ETHANOL REVISITED

H. Shapouri, J. A. Duffield, M. Wang·2003·Transactions of the ASAE

Abstract

Studies conducted since the late 1970s have estimated the net energy value (NEV) of corn ethanol. However,variations in data and assumptions used among the studies have resulted in a wide range of estimates. This study identifiesthe factors causing this wide variation and develops a more consistent estimate. We conclude that the NEV of corn ethanolhas been rising over time due to technological advances in ethanol conversion and increased efficiency in farm production.We show that corn ethanol is energy efficient, as indicated by an energy output:input ratio of 1.34 and 1.53 under a bestcasescenario.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.13951

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Shapouri, H., Duffield, J. A., & Wang, M.
Venue
Transactions of the ASAE
Published
2003
Volume
46
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0059
OpenAlex
W2013668287
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ENERGY BALANCE OF CORN ETHANOL REVISITED. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.13951
The paper
Shapouri, H., Duffield, J. A., & Wang, M. (2003). THE ENERGY BALANCE OF CORN ETHANOL REVISITED. Transactions of the ASAE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13951

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.