WOOD-BASED FILTER FOR NITRATE REMOVAL IN SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Abstract
The recognition that septic systems can generate groundwater plumes with nitrate concentrations exceeding thedrinking water limit has led to a need for improved nitrogen removal in septic systems. Long-term (3 to 5 year) monitoringresults are presented for four full-scale, on-site wastewater treatment systems using a novel porous media filter (Nitrex filter)for enhanced nitrogen removal. The filter removes nitrogen by denitrification of pretreated, nitrified, septic tank effluent usinga slowly soluble carbon source (wood byproduct material) incorporated into the filter. Results are presented for a house (sewageflow ~1 m3 d-1), a trailer park (7 m3 d-1), a communal residence (18 m3 d-1), and an inn (73 m3 d-1). In each case, theseptic tank effluent was pretreated using a sand filter, then flowed passively through the denitrification filter, and finally wasdispersed in a conventional tile bed. Influent (sand filter) NO3-N concentrations, averaging 14.2 to 37.7 mg L-1, weresignificantly attenuated in the denitrification filters at each site (p 10 mg N L-1 d-1, and showed no sign of deteriorating withsystem age at any of the sites. Results support previous mass balance calculations and pilot-scale field trials, suggesting thatsuch filters have the potential to operate for years without the need for media replenishment. These filters offer a practicalsolution to nitrate control in small to medium sized on-site wastewater treatment systems where simplicity of operation andlow maint…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At the septic tank site, the site was N-limited, so the low removal rate accounted for 87-98% of the NO3 entering the system.
“However, the site was N-limited, so this low rate accounted for 87 -98% of the NO 3 entering the system (Robertson et al., 2005).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2005
NO3-removal rates of 2-5 g N m-3 d-1 have been found at sites that received NO3-rich groundwater plumes from septic tanks.
“NO 3 -removal rates of 2 -5 g N m -3 d -1 have been found at sites that received NO 3 --rich groundwater plumes from septic tanks.”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Robertson et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Denitrifying bioreactors—an approach for reducing nitrate loads to receiving waters
Schipper, L. A., Robertson, W. D., Gold, A. J., Jaynes, D. B., & Cameron, S. C. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.008 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
“Robertson et al. (2005a) measured lower removal ates (2–5 g N m−3 day−1), during evaluation of the commercially vailable NitrexTM filter which contains a mixture of sawdust and oodchips; however, removal rates were nitrate-limited at these ites.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationNitrate removal and hydraulic performance of organic carbon for use in denitrification beds
Cameron, S. G., & Schipper, L. A. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.010 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Nitrate removal rates in woodchip media of varying age
Robertson, W. D. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.01.008 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationNitrate removal rates in a 15-year-old permeable reactive barrier treating septic system nitrate
Robertson, W. D., Vogan, J. L., & Lombardo, P. S. (2008) · Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2008.00205.x · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnical Note: Hydraulic Property Determination of Denitrifying Bioreactor Fill Media
Christianson, L., Castelló, A., Christianson, R., Helmers, M., & Bhandari, A. (2010) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.34946 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall
Long, L. M., Schipper, L. A., & Bruesewitz, D. A. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.005 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robertson, W. D., Ford, G. I., & Lombardo, P. S.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASAE
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-128
- ISSN
- 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0059
- OpenAlex
- W2051420360
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the ASAE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
- Keywords
- nitrate removal, septic systems, denitrification, on-site wastewater treatment, septic tank effluent, groundwater nitrate contamination, temperature dependence of reaction rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review