Cited by 72Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil and Unsaturated FlowUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Technical Note: Hydraulic Property Determination of Denitrifying Bioreactor Fill Media

L. Christianson, A. Castelló, R. Christianson, M. Helmers, A. Bhandari·2010·Applied Engineering in Agriculture

Abstract

Denitrification bioreactors are one of the newest options for nitrate removal in agricultural drainage waters. Optimization of denitrification bioreactor design requires the ability to identify concrete values for the hydraulic properties of bioreactor fill media. Hydraulic properties, chiefly saturated hydraulic conductivity but also porosity and particle size, are not known for many types of possible bioreactor media though they have a significant impact upon bioreactor design and performance. This work was undertaken to more fully quantify the hydraulic properties of the major type of fill media used in Iowa denitrification bioreactors through a series of porosity, hydraulic conductivity, and particle size analysis tests. In addition, a particle size analysis was performed for two types of woodchips and one type of wood shreds in order to quantify and highlight the differences between what is commonly referred to as wood fill. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was determined for blends of woodchips, corn cobs, and pea gravel. For one of the most common types of woodchips used in bioreactors, the porosity varied from 66% to 78% depending on packing density and the average saturated hydraulic conductivity was 9.5 cm/s. It was found that additions of pea gravel significantly increased the hydraulic conductivity of woodchips though additions of corn cobs did not. Regardless of the fill mixture used, it is vital to design the bioreactor using the hydraulic properties for that specific media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.34946

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christianson, L., Castelló, A., Christianson, R., Helmers, M., & Bhandari, A.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Universitat de Lleida (ES)
  • Kansas State University (US)
Venue
Applied Engineering in Agriculture
Published
2010
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
849-854
ISSN
  • 0883-8542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7838
OpenAlex
W2066537229
Cited by
72
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Engineering in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Iowa State University
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
denitrification bioreactors, saturated hydraulic conductivity, porosity, particle size distribution, wood chips, corn cob, pea gravel, agricultural drainage water, nitrate removal, bioreactor design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review