Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT

Open access
M. K. Jha, P. W. Gassman, J. G. Arnold·2007·Transactions of the ASABE

Abstract

The Raccoon River watershed (RRW) in west-central Iowa has been recognized as exporting some of the highest nitrate-nitrogen loadings in the U.S. and is a major source of sediment and other nutrient loadings. An integrated modeling framework has been constructed for the 9,400 km2 RRW that consists of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model, the interactive SWAT (i_SWAT) software package, the Load Estimator (LOADEST) computer program, and other supporting software and databases. The simulation framework includes detailed land use and management data, such as different crop rotations, and an array of nutrient and tillage management schemes, derived from the USDA National Resources Inventory (NRI) databases and other sources. This article presents the calibration and validation of SWAT for the streamflow, sediment losses, and nutrient loadings in the watershed, and an assessment of land use and management practice shifts in controlling pollution. Streamflow, sediment yield, and nitrate loadings were calibrated for the period 1981-1992 and validated for the period 1993-2003. Limited field data on organic nitrogen, organic phosphorus, and mineral phosphorus allowed model validation for the period 2001-2003. Model predictions generally performed very well on both an annual and monthly basis during the calibration and validation periods, as indicated by R2 and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (E) values that exceeded 0.7 in most cases. A set of land use change scenarios depicting conversion of cropland into land set-aside resulted in large reductions of sediment yield at the watershed outlet. A second scenario set found that reductions in nutrient applications of 10% to 20% resulted in similar predicted percentage reductions in nitrate loadings at the watershed outlet and in corresponding corn yield reductions of 3% to 6%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/2013.22660

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Jha, M. K., Gassman, P. W., & Arnold, J. G.
Venue
Transactions of the ASABE
Published
2007
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
479-493
ISSN
  • 2151-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-0040
OpenAlex
W1590390505
Cited by
184
References
2
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.22660
The paper
Jha, M. K., Gassman, P. W., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT. Transactions of the ASABE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22660

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.