The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT
Open accessAbstract
The Raccoon River watershed (RRW) in west-central Iowa has been recognized as exporting some of the highest nitrate-nitrogen loadings in the U.S. and is a major source of sediment and other nutrient loadings. An integrated modeling framework has been constructed for the 9,400 km2 RRW that consists of the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model, the interactive SWAT (i_SWAT) software package, the Load Estimator (LOADEST) computer program, and other supporting software and databases. The simulation framework includes detailed land use and management data, such as different crop rotations, and an array of nutrient and tillage management schemes, derived from the USDA National Resources Inventory (NRI) databases and other sources. This article presents the calibration and validation of SWAT for the streamflow, sediment losses, and nutrient loadings in the watershed, and an assessment of land use and management practice shifts in controlling pollution. Streamflow, sediment yield, and nitrate loadings were calibrated for the period 1981-1992 and validated for the period 1993-2003. Limited field data on organic nitrogen, organic phosphorus, and mineral phosphorus allowed model validation for the period 2001-2003. Model predictions generally performed very well on both an annual and monthly basis during the calibration and validation periods, as indicated by R2 and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (E) values that exceeded 0.7 in most cases. A set of land use change scenarios depicting conversion of cropland into land set-aside resulted in large reductions of sediment yield at the watershed outlet. A second scenario set found that reductions in nutrient applications of 10% to 20% resulted in similar predicted percentage reductions in nitrate loadings at the watershed outlet and in corresponding corn yield reductions of 3% to 6%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23153 · Cited by 13,446
Self-citationLARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Self-citation
Cited by
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Self-citationSchilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y., Gassman, P. W., & Wolter, C. F. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2007wr006644 · Cited by 450
Self-citationSWAT‐simulated hydrological impact of land‐use change in the Zanjanrood basin, Northwest Iran
Ghaffari, G., Keesstra, S., Ghodousi, J., & Ahmadi, H. (2010) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.7530 · Cited by 260
Chen, Y., Ale, S., Rajan, N., & Srinivasan, R. (2017) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2017.07.011 · Cited by 28
Zhou, X. V., Clark, C. D., Nair, S. S., Hawkins, S. A., & Lambert, D. M. (2015) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.018 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Jha, M. K., Gassman, P. W., & Arnold, J. G.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASABE
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-493
- ISSN
- 2151-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0040
- OpenAlex
- W1590390505
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.22660
- The paper
- Jha, M. K., Gassman, P. W., & Arnold, J. G. (2007). Water Quality Modeling for the Raccoon River Watershed Using SWAT. Transactions of the ASABE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22660
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.