The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Over the last century, land use and land cover (LULC) in the United States Corn Belt region shifted from mixed perennial and annual cropping systems to primarily annual crops. Historical LULC change impacted the annual water balance in many Midwestern basins by decreasing annual evapotranspiration (ET) and increasing streamflow and base flow. Recent expansion of the biofuel industry may lead to future LULC changes from increasing corn acreage and potential conversion of the industry to cellulosic bioenergy crops of warm or cool season grasses. In this paper, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to evaluate potential impacts from future LULC change on the annual and seasonal water balance of the Raccoon River watershed in west‐central Iowa. Three primary scenarios for LULC change and three scenario variants were evaluated, including an expansion of corn acreage in the watershed and two scenarios involving expansion of land using warm season and cool season grasses for ethanol biofuel. Modeling results were consistent with historical observations. Increased corn production will decrease annual ET and increase water yield and losses of nitrate, phosphorus, and sediment, whereas increasing perennialization will increase ET and decrease water yield and loss of nonpoint source pollutants. However, widespread tile drainage that exists today may limit the extent to which a mixed perennial‐annual land cover would ever resemble pre‐1940s hydrologic conditions. Study results indicate that future LULC change will affect the water balance of the watershed, with consequences largely dependent on the future LULC trajectory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Self-citation
Cited by
Heaton, E. A., Dohleman, F. G., Miguez, A. F., Juvik, J. A., Lozovaya, V., Widholm, J., Zabotina, O. A., McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., Voigt, T. B., et al. (2010) · Advances in Botanical Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381518-7.00003-0 · Cited by 258
Kim, H. K., Parajuli, P. B., & Filip To, S. D. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.007 · Cited by 43
Cooney, D., Kim, H., Quinn, L., Lee, M.-S., Guo, J., CHEN, S.-L., XU, B.-C., & Lee, D. K. (2017) · Journal of Integrative Agriculture · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(16)61587-3 · Cited by 35
Housh, M., Yaeger, M. A., Cai, X., McIsaac, G. F., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Ouyang, Y., Al-Qadi, I., & Jain, A. K. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02712 · Cited by 30
Chen, Y., Ale, S., Rajan, N., & Srinivasan, R. (2017) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2017.07.011 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y., Gassman, P. W., & Wolter, C. F.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1776008735
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2007wr006644
- The paper
- Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y., Gassman, P. W., & Wolter, C. F. (2008). Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.