The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANSWERS: A Model for Watershed Planning
Abstract
ABSTRACT IN recent years, a greatly increased emphasis has been placed on improving and maintaining the quality of our national water resources. Agencies and individuals from the various levels of government, industry and private life are seeking information concerning the ef-fects that land use, management, and conservation prac-tices or structures might have on the quality and quantity of water from both agricultural and non-agricultural watersheds. ANSWERS (Areal Nonpoint Source Watershed En-vironment Response Simulation) was developed in an ef-fort to supply the desired information described above for primarily agricultural watersheds. The overall struc-ture consists of a hydrologic model, a sediment detachment/transport model and several routing com-ponents necessary to describe the movement of water in overland, subsurface and channel flow phases. ANSWERS, unlike many large-scale watershed model structures, uses distributed (rather than lumped) parameters and is event (rather than long-term) oriented. These operational features generally yield a better understanding of the hydrologic and water quality interactions involved in a watershed by allowing the user to physically describe those processes both spatially and temporally. The purpose of this report is to present the operational concepts, the basic mathematical model used in ANSWERS, general data needs and user considerations. In addition, the potential utility of ANSWERS as a plan-ning tool is demonstrated by simulating several manage-ment alternatives for a primarily agricultural watershed in northeastern Indiana subjected to several different precipitation events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., & Bernhardt, G. (1993) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-s · Cited by 939
DE ROO, A. P. J., WESSELING, C. G., & RITSEMA, C. J. (1996) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(199608)10:8<1107::aid-hyp415>3.0.co;2-4 · Cited by 567
How soil erosion model conceptualization affects soil loss projections under climate change
Eekhout, J. P., & De Vente, J. (2020) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133319871937 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Beasley, D. B., Huggins, L. F., & Monke, E. J.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASAE
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 0938-0944
- ISSN
- 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0059
- OpenAlex
- W1989556826
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANSWERS: A Model for Watershed Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13031/2013.34692
- The paper
- Beasley, D. B., Huggins, L. F., & Monke, E. J. (1980). ANSWERS: A Model for Watershed Planning. Transactions of the ASAE. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.