USING CULTURES OF "EFFECTIVE MICROORGANISMS" (EM) AS INOCULUM IN SUBSTRATES FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Abstract
Abstract. In the 1970 's the Japanese horticulturist and researcher Dr. Teruo Higa, initiated the use of a culture of microorganisms beneficial to soil, which he named "Effective Microorganisms" (EM). Currently, research about this culture have not only demonstrated its effectiveness in improving soil characteristics, but also as an alternative way to accelerate the degradation of organic matter in waste treatment systems. That is, it can be inferred that the use of an established culture of microorganisms must accelerate and/or improve the process of digestion of an organic material. Starting from the principle proven in several scientific surveys, that the addition of inoculum to substrate in anaerobic digestion in digesters, increases the process efficiency, the main objective of this study was to test the EM culture, as inoculum, influencing the efficiency of waste treatment and the biogas production. The culture of EM, prepared for this work, was obtained from the colonies captured on the “A horizon" of a forest soil (secondary forest, the Atlantic Forest biome, Brazil) where it was placed cooked rice in contact with the ground, during 15 days. After that, the established colonies were separated according their colors; being discarded all shades of black, gray and white. The selected ones were reproduced in a sugarcane broth medium for 15 days in order to compose the EM. Twelve bench digesters were used, with a total capacity of three liters of substrate, each one. The treatments consisted of different additions of EM (concentrations of 15 %(T1), 10 % (T2) , 1%(T3) and 0 %(T4), as inoculum, to the substrates composed of dairy cattle waste, with three replications each one, being digested under controlled temperature (35oC). The collected data refer to the characteristics of the effluent, inoculum and influent, such as concentrations of total, fixed and volatile solids (TS, VS and FS), pH and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (COD). The pH of the EM was 3.34 and its COD was 24,250 mg.L-1. The accumulated biogas production was 20.601 L biogas per L substrate for T3. The efficiency removing COD and TS were 79.44% and 42.50%, respectively for T4. It was concluded that, aiming energetic improvement, small concentration of EM in the substrate, may be advantageous to the anaerobic digestion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible for a small EM concentration in the substrate to have an advantage over anaerobic digestion.
“He came to the conclusion that it is possible for a small EM concentration in the substrate to have an advantage over the anaerobic digestion [18].”
From Environmental applications of Effective Microorganisms: a review of current knowledge and recommendations for future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Safwat, S. M., & Matta, M. E. (2021) · Journal of Engineering and Applied Science · doi:10.1186/s44147-021-00049-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gates, R. S., Batista, M. D., de Souza, C. F., Tinôco, I. D. F. F., Miranda, S., & Alvares, F. F.
- Venue
- 2014 ASABE Annual International Meeting
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Pages
- 1-9
- OpenAlex
- W2594239322
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASABE Annual International Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
- Keywords
- effective microorganisms, inoculum, anaerobic digestion, biogas production, COD removal, volatile solids removal, waste treatment efficiency, small-scale biogas plants, organic matter decomposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review