Cited by 3Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermoregulation and physiological responsesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Modeling skin temperature to assess the effect of air velocity to mitigate heat stress among growing pigs

Bjerg, Bjarne, Pedersen, Poul, Morsing, Svend, Zhang, Guoqiang·2017·2017 Spokane, Washington July 16 - July 19, 2017

Abstract

Abstract. It is generally accepted that increased air velocity can help to mitigate heat stress in livestock housing, however, it is not fully clear how much it helps and significant uncertainties exists when the air temperature approaches the animal body temperature. This study aims to develop a skin temperature model to generated data for determining the potential effect of air velocity to mitigate heat stress among growing pigs housed in warm environment. The model calculates the skin temperature as function of body temperature, air temperature and the resistances for heat transfer from the body to the skin and from the skin to the surroundings. The latter is modelled as the united resistance for convection, radiation and evaporation. The model considers that the thermal heat load affects the tissue resistance, the body temperature and the evaporation from the skin, which is managed by modeling the tissue resistance, the body temperature and evaporation from the skin as functions of the skin temperature. The results indicate that the combination of an air temperature of 24 °C and an air velocity 0.2 m/s results in the same skin temperature as the combinations of 27 °C and 0.6 m/s, and of 30 °C and 1.9 m/s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13031/aim.201700631

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In existing mechanistic models, skin blood flow was normally included in internal heat conduction between tissues using an equivalent tissue resistance expressed by linear relationships.

    “It was normally included in the internal heat conduction between tissues using an equivalent ' tissue resistance ' expressed by linear relationships (Turnpenny, et al., 2000b; Bjerg et al., 2017).”
  • Existing mechanistic models have not succeeded in explicitly interpreting panting and vasodilatation, which significantly influence the prediction ability of mechanistic models.

    “Based on the best knowledge of the authors, the existing mechanistic models (Bjerg, Pedersen, Morsing, & Zhang, 2017; Bruce & Clark, 1979; Fialho, Bucklin, Zazueta, & Myer, 2004; McArthur, 1987; Turnpenny, McArthur, Clark, & Wathes, 2000a; Turnpenny, Wathes, Clark, & McArthur, 2000b) have not succeeded in explicitly interpreting the two most essential interactions between the t”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjerg, B., Pedersen, P., Morsing, S., & Zhang, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Venue
2017 Spokane, Washington July 16 - July 19, 2017
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2756390468
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
2017 Spokane, Washington July 16 - July 19, 2017 (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
air velocity, heat stress mitigation, growing pigs, pig housing, heat transfer resistance, skin evaporation, body temperature, tissue resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review