Cited by 344CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Measuring permanence of CO2 storage in saline formations: the Frio experiment

Open access
Hovorka, Susan D., Benson, Sally M., Doughty, Christine, Freifeld, Barry M., Sakurai, Shinichi, Daley, Thomas M., Kharaka, Yousif K., Holtz, Mark H. +4 more·2006·Environmental Geosciences

Abstract

If CO2 released from fossil fuel during energy production is returned to the subsurface, will it be retained for periods of time significant enough to benefit the atmosphere? Can trapping be assured in saline formations where there is no history of hydrocarbon accumulation? The Frio experiment in Texas was undertaken to provide answers to these questions. One thousand six hundred metric tons of CO2 were injected into the Frio Formation, which underlies large areas of the United States Gulf Coast. Reservoir characterization and numerical modeling were used to design the experiment, as well as to interpret the results through history matching. Closely spaced measurements in space and time were collected to observe the evolution of immiscible and dissolved CO2 during and after injection. The high-permeability, steeply dipping sandstone allowed updip flow of supercritical CO2 as a result of the density contrast with formation brine and absence of a local structural trap. The front of the CO2 plume moved more quickly than had been modeled. By the end of the 10-day injection, however, the plume geometry in the plane of the observation and injection wells had thickened to a distribution similar to the modeled distribution. As expected, CO2 dissolved rapidly into brine, causing pH to fall and calcite and metals to be dissolved. Postinjection measurements, including time-lapse vertical seismic profiling transects along selected azimuths, cross-well seismic topography, and saturation logs, show that CO2 migration under gravity slowed greatly 2 months after injection, matching model predictions that significant CO2 is trapped as relative permeability decreases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1306/eg.11210505011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hovorka, S. D., Benson, S. M., Doughty, C., Freifeld, B. M., Sakurai, S., Daley, T. M., Kharaka, Y. K., Holtz, M. H., Trautz, R. C., Nance, H. S., Myer, L. R., & Knauss, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Bureau of Economic Geology (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Environmental Geosciences
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
105-121
ISSN
  • 1075-9565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-0984
OpenAlex
W2149511356
Cited by
344
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
24.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Geosciences (publishedVersion)
  • Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
saline aquifers, Frio Formation, dissolved CO2, CO2 plume migration, relative permeability, calcite dissolution, CO2 trapping, reservoir characterization, history matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review