Measuring permanence of CO2 storage in saline formations: the Frio experiment
Open accessAbstract
If CO2 released from fossil fuel during energy production is returned to the subsurface, will it be retained for periods of time significant enough to benefit the atmosphere? Can trapping be assured in saline formations where there is no history of hydrocarbon accumulation? The Frio experiment in Texas was undertaken to provide answers to these questions. One thousand six hundred metric tons of CO2 were injected into the Frio Formation, which underlies large areas of the United States Gulf Coast. Reservoir characterization and numerical modeling were used to design the experiment, as well as to interpret the results through history matching. Closely spaced measurements in space and time were collected to observe the evolution of immiscible and dissolved CO2 during and after injection. The high-permeability, steeply dipping sandstone allowed updip flow of supercritical CO2 as a result of the density contrast with formation brine and absence of a local structural trap. The front of the CO2 plume moved more quickly than had been modeled. By the end of the 10-day injection, however, the plume geometry in the plane of the observation and injection wells had thickened to a distribution similar to the modeled distribution. As expected, CO2 dissolved rapidly into brine, causing pH to fall and calcite and metals to be dissolved. Postinjection measurements, including time-lapse vertical seismic profiling transects along selected azimuths, cross-well seismic topography, and saturation logs, show that CO2 migration under gravity slowed greatly 2 months after injection, matching model predictions that significant CO2 is trapped as relative permeability decreases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most favored technique for CO2 plume monitoring is seismic imaging.
“However, the most favored technique for CO 2 plume monitoring is seismic imaging”
From An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations (2019) · cites this paper as Hovorka et al., 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role and impact of CO2–rock interactions during CO2 storage in sedimentary rocks
Gaus, I. (2010) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.015 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
“However, the most favored technique for CO2 plume monitoring is seismic imaging (Hovorka et al., 2006; Pevzner et al., 2011; Ivanova et al., 2012; Ajo-Franklin et al., 2013; White, 2013; Jenkins et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationCarbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects
de Coninck, H., & Benson, S. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032112-095222 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Nanoscale Basis of CO<sub>2</sub> Trapping for Geologic Storage
Bourg, I. C., Beckingham, L. E., & DePaolo, D. J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03003 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hovorka, S. D., Benson, S. M., Doughty, C., Freifeld, B. M., Sakurai, S., Daley, T. M., Kharaka, Y. K., Holtz, M. H., Trautz, R. C., Nance, H. S., Myer, L. R., & Knauss, K. G.
- Affiliations
- Bureau of Economic Geology (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Geosciences
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-121
- ISSN
- 1075-9565 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-0984
- OpenAlex
- W2149511356
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 24.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environmental Geosciences (publishedVersion)
- Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Keywords
- saline aquifers, Frio Formation, dissolved CO2, CO2 plume migration, relative permeability, calcite dissolution, CO2 trapping, reservoir characterization, history matching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review