Cited by 1Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistic Variation and Morphology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Pre-service English teachers’ cue-weighting in L2 stop perception*

Open access
Lee, Hyunjung, Kong, Eun Jong·2024·Phonetics and Speech Sciences

Abstract

This study investigates how Korean second language (L2) learners of English perceive the voicing contrast, primarily signaled by voice onset time (VOT) and fundamental frequency (F0), and how attentional load influences their use of these acoustic cues. Testing pre-service English teachers, we observed a general preference for VOT over F0 in identifying the voicing contrast, consistent with the pattern previously reported in native English speakers. At the group level, the interaction between distraction and each acoustic cue revealed that increased cognitive load reduced reliance on both VOT and F0. However, an analysis of individual correlation coefficient showed that VOT and F0 were not equally affected by the distraction. While both cues were negatively influenced, individuals whose reliance on VOT decreased more under cognitive load tended to maintain their reliance on F0. This suggests a compensatory relationship between the two acoustic cues. We discussed that Korean learners’ cue-weighting strategies may be influenced by their native language (L1) and classroom learning environments, which limit exposure to naturalistic listening conditions and hinder perceptual flexibility. This study underscores the role of L1 transfer in shaping L2 speech perception and highlights the need for training that incorporates real-world listening challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13064/ksss.2024.16.4.035

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Abramson, A. S., & Lisker, L. (1985). Relative power of cues: F0 shift versus voice timing. In: V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp.25-33). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  2. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. K. (2019). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioural experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 388-407. 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x 31016684 PMC7005094 · DOI
  3. Asano, Y. (2018). Discriminating non-native segmental length contrasts under increased task demands. Language and Speech, 61(3), 409-429. 10.1177/0023830917731907 29027494 · DOI
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using the lme4. arXiv. 10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chung, E. S., & Ahn, S. (2019). Examining cloze tests as a measure of linguistic complexity in L2 writing. Language Research, 55(3), 627-649. 10.30961/lr.2019.55.3.627 · DOI
  6. Francis, A., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 349-366. 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.349 11999859 · DOI
  7. Francis, A. L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2000). Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1668-1680. 10.3758/BF03212164 11140187 · DOI
  8. Francis, A. L., Kaganovich, N., & Driscoll-Huber, C. (2008). Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1234-1251. 10.1121/1.2945161 18681610 PMC2680590 · DOI
  9. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26 8427480 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Goldberg, L. R. (2001). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure (1st ed.). In S. Hyman (Ed.), Personality and personality disorders (pp. 34-47). London, UK: Routledge.
  11. Gordon, P. C., Eberhardt, J. L., & Rueckl, J. G. (1993). Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 1-42. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1001 8425384 · DOI
  12. Hutchinson, A. E. (2022). Individual variability and the effect of personality on non-native speech shadowing. JASA Express Letters, 2(6), 065203. 10.1121/10.0011753 36154159 · DOI
  13. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  14. Jun, H. (2018). Cloze test for proficient in Korean as a second/foreign language (Master’s thesis), Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  15. Kim, S. (2015). Ppcor: An R package for a fast calculation to semi-partial correlation coefficients. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22(6), 665-674. 10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.6.665 26688802 PMC4681537 · DOI
  16. Kong, E. J., & Lee, H. (2018). Attentional modulation and individual differences in explaining the changing role of fundamental frequency in Korean laryngeal stop perception. Language and Speech, 61(3), 384-408. 10.1177/0023830917729840 28937301 · DOI
  17. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lee, H. (2014). Effects of attention on the perception of L2 phonetic contrast. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 6(4), 47-52. 10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.4.047 · DOI
  19. Lee, H., Holliday, J. J., & Kong, E. J. (2020). Diachronic change and synchronic variation in the Korean stop laryngeal contrast. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(7), e12374. 10.1111/lnc3.12374 · DOI
  20. Lee, H., & Kong, E. J. (2023). Attentional modulation on multiple acoustic cues in phonological processing of L2 sounds. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 15(4), 11-16. 10.13064/KSSS.2023.15.4.011 · DOI
  21. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. WORD, 20(3), 384-422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 · DOI
  22. Mattys, S. L., & Wiget, L. (2011). Effect of cognitive load on speech recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 145-160. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.004 · DOI
  23. Mora, J. C., & Darcy, I. (2023) Individual differences in attention control and the processing of phonological contrasts in a second language. Phonetica, 80(3-4), 153-184. 10.1515/phon-2022-0020 37341707 · DOI
  24. Munro, M. J., & Bohn, O. S. (2007). The study of second language speech. In O. S. Bohn, & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 3-11). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins B.V. 10.1075/lllt.17.06mun · DOI
  25. Racine, J. S. (2012). RStudio: A platform-independent IDE for R and Sweave, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(1), 167-172. 10.1002/jae.1278 · DOI
  26. Whalen, D. H., Abramson, A. S., Lisker, L., & Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(4), 2152-2159. 10.1121/1.406678 8473630 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Yu, A. C. L. (2010). Perceptual compensation is correlated with individuals’ ‘autistic’ traits: Implications for models of sound change. PLOS ONE, 5(8), e11950. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011950 20808859 PMC2924381 · DOI
  28. Yu, A., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M. (2013) Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality, and “autistic” traits. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e74746. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074746 24098665 PMC3786990 · DOI
  29. Yu, A. C. L. (2022). Perceptual cue weighting is influenced by the listener’s gender and subjective evaluations of the speaker: The case of English stop voicing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 840291. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840291 35529558 PMC9067435 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lee, H., & Kong, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Incheon National University (KR)
  • Korea Aerospace University (KR)
Venue
Phonetics and Speech Sciences
Published
2024-12
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
35-42
ISSN
  • 2005-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 2586-5854
OpenAlex
W4406478811
Cited by
1
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Phonetics and Speech Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2024S1A5A2A01024518)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Keywords
cue weighting, voicing contrast, voice onset time, fundamental frequency, cognitive load, distraction, Korean learners of English, pre-service English teachers, first language influence, perceptual flexibility, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pre-service English teachers’ cue-weighting in L2 stop perception*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13064/ksss.2024.16.4.035
The paper
Lee, H., & Kong, E. J. (2024). Pre-service English teachers’ cue-weighting in L2 stop perception*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences. https://doi.org/10.13064/ksss.2024.16.4.035