Cited by 18Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural and Food SciencesForest Management and Policy

Productivity and Cost of Integrated Harvesting for Fuel Reduction Thinning in Mixed-Conifer Forest

Vitorelo, Brian, Han, Han-Sup, Elliot, William·2011·Forest Products Journal

Abstract

Removing submerchantable size trees and forest residues as well as sawlogs is preferred in fuel reduction thinning because it improves treatment effectiveness and avoids slash burning. Fuel reduction thinning was investigated to describe integrated harvesting machine processes and productivity and to characterize stump-to-truck costs for sawlogs and biomass for energy production. This system was studied in mixed-conifer forest on land owned by the US Forest Service in northern California and southern Oregon. Detailed time-study methods were paired with standard machine rate calculation methods to evaluate productivity and costs for the system. Sensitivity analysis and a standardized comparison were performed to evaluate costs and productivity under varying operation parameters. Treatment costs (stump-to-truck; without mobilization, overhead, or profit) were US$0.42/ft 3 for sawlogs and US$52.41 per bone dry ton (BDT) for biomass. Standardized unit production costs for sawlog skidding varied little, but the smaller skidder was clearly preferable for biomass tree skidding when external skidding distances exceeded 200 feet. The grinder had the highest hourly cost of any machine in the system and its unit production cost (US$/BDT) was sensitive to changes in utilization rate. Evaluations on system balance showed that improved utilization of the grinder could be accomplished as the grinder and loader often waited for a chip van. Integrated harvesting was a cost-effective way of im…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13073/0015-7473-61.8.664

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vitorelo, B., Han, H.-S., & Elliot, W.
Venue
Forest Products Journal
Published
2011-12
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
664-674
ISSN
0015-7473 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089523739
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Products Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
mixed conifer forest, biomass harvesting, chipper, skidder, time study, machine productivity, cost analysis, forest residues, slash burning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review