Cited by 25Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementForest Management and PolicyForest ecology and management

The Cost of Forest Thinning Operations in the Western United States: A Systematic Literature Review and New Thinning Cost Model

Chang, Heesol, Han, Han-Sup, Anderson, Nathaniel, Kim, Yeon-Su, Han, Sang-Kyun·2023·Journal of Forestry

Abstract

Mechanical forest thinning treatments are implemented across the western United States (US) to improve forest health and reduce hazardous fuels. However, the main challenge in thinning operations is low financial feasibility. This study synthesized the stump-to-truck cost of forest thinning operations in the western US based on operations research articles published over the last 40 years (1980–2020). We systematically selected and reviewed 20 thinning studies to analyze key variables affecting machine productivity and harvesting costs. The average cost of forest thinning was lowest for a mechanized whole-tree thinning operation at $21.34/ton or $2,075/ha. Feller-bunchers and skidders showed the highest productivity in felling and extraction machines, respectively. We found that extraction cost accounted for the largest proportion of the stump-to-truck cost of forest thinning (33%, 43%, and 34% in whole-tree, tree-length, and cut-to-length thinning, respectively). Tree diameter and machine travel distance are common variables affecting thinning productivity and thus cost, regardless of the harvesting methods used. With thinning productivity and cost data from the selected studies, we developed a spreadsheet-based model to estimate thinning costs for various harvesting systems. This literature synthesis and new thinning cost model can help foresters develop a cost-effective plan for thinning operations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jofore/fvac037

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, H., Han, H.-S., Anderson, N., Kim, Y.-S., & Han, S.-K.
Affiliations
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Han, Han-Sup
Venue
Journal of Forestry
Published
2022-12-14
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
193-206
ISSN
  • 0022-1201 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3746
OpenAlex
W4311457544
Cited by
25
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Forestry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Technology and Research Initiative Fund
  • U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
forest thinning, mechanical thinning, feller-buncher, skidder, machine productivity, tree diameter, forest health, American West

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review