The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum
Open accessAbstract
Anatomy in undergraduate education has been in decline for many years. Some suggest that it has fallen below a safe level. Balances between detail and safety, and assimilation and application of anatomy have yet to be established as the methods of teaching undergo another metamorphosis. For doctors, the human body is the focus of investigation and intervention on a daily basis; for this reason, the study of anatomy in some form will continue to be essential to safe medical practice. It is necessary for core knowledge of anatomy to be assimilated by all doctors in order to practice and communicate safely. It may be true that most doctors do not need to dissect a cadaver or study a prosection in order to practice, but if it can improve their understanding of what they do and why they do it, this surely has to be of benefit both for the safety of the patient and satisfaction of the doctor as a professional. Integration of newer teaching modalities and modern technology will encourage interest and retention of anatomical knowledge and its clinical relevance. Anatomy has a promising future in postgraduate specialist and surgical training. Detailed knowledge should be integrated into specialist training when it is clinically relevant allowing specialists of the future to practice safely and accurately and also to provide a strong base for future clinical developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization
Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.139 · Cited by 991
Augmented reality in medical education: students’ experiences and learning outcomes
Dhar, P., Rocks, T., Samarasinghe, R. M., Stephenson, G., & Smith, C. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953 · Cited by 325
Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future
Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209 · Cited by 120
Pickering, J. D., & Swinnerton, B. J. (2019) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1810 · Cited by 118
Bains, M., Kaliski, D. Z., & Goei, K. A. (2022) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00039.2021 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Turney, B.
- Venue
- The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Publisher
- Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-107
- ISSN
- 0035-8843 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-7083
- OpenAlex
- W2031169371
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1308/003588407x168244
- The paper
- Turney, B. (2007). Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407x168244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.