The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization
Open accessAbstract
Anatomy has historically been a cornerstone in medical education regardless of nation or specialty. Until recently, dissection and didactic lectures were its sole pedagogy. Teaching methodology has been revolutionized with more reliance on models, imaging, simulation, and the Internet to further consolidate and enhance the learning experience. Moreover, modern medical curricula are giving less importance to anatomy education and to the acknowledged value of dissection. Universities have even abandoned dissection completely in favor of user‐friendly multimedia, alternative teaching approaches, and newly defined priorities in clinical practice. Anatomy curriculum is undergoing international reformation but the current framework lacks uniformity among institutions. Optimal learning content can be categorized into the following modalities: (1) dissection/prosection, (2) interactive multimedia, (3) procedural anatomy, (4) surface and clinical anatomy, and (5) imaging. The importance of multimodal teaching, with examples suggested in this article, has been widely recognized and assessed. Nevertheless, there are still ongoing limitations in anatomy teaching. Substantial problems consist of diminished allotted dissection time and the number of qualified anatomy instructors, which will eventually deteriorate the quality of education. Alternative resources and strategies are discussed in an attempt to tackle these genuine concerns. The challenges are to reinstate more effective teaching and learning tools while maintaining the beneficial values of orthodox dissection. The UK has a reputable medical education but its quality could be improved by observing international frameworks. The heavy penalty of not concentrating on sufficient anatomy education will inevitably lead to incompetent anatomists and healthcare professionals, leaving patients to face dire repercussions. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83–93, 2010. © 2010 American Association of Anatomists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wood, D. F. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328 · Cited by 2,134
Management of organizational behavior : utilizing human resources
Hersey, P. W., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (1993) · Cited by 1,196
Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School
Papadakis, M. A., Teherani, A., Banach, M. A., Knettler, T. R., Rattner, S. L., Stern, D. T., Veloski, J. J., & Hodgson, C. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa052596 · Cited by 840
Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2009) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.117 · Cited by 815
Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum
Turney, B. (2007) · The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/003588407x168244 · Cited by 791
Teaching anatomy without cadavers
McLachlan, J. C., Bligh, J., Bradley, P., & Searle, J. (2004) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01795.x · Cited by 602
Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation
Older, J. (2004) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/s1479-666x(04)80050-7 · Cited by 536
Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future
McLachlan, J. C., & Patten, D. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02401.x · Cited by 462
Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy
Burton, J. L., & Underwood, J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60376-6 · Cited by 440
Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence
Winkelmann, A. (2007) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02625.x · Cited by 411
Cited by
The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1475 · Cited by 698
Zhao, J., Xu, X., Jiang, H., & Ding, Y. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-1994-z · Cited by 445
The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy
Khot, Z., Quinlan, K., Norman, G. R., & Wainman, B. (2013) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1355 · Cited by 274
Trelease, R. B. (2016) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1620 · Cited by 266
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
James, H. K., Chapman, A. W., Pattison, G. T. R., Griffin, D. R., & Fisher, J. D. (2019) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11325 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A.
- Venue
- Anatomical Sciences Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-9780
- OpenAlex
- W1964809186
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 29.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ase.139
- The paper
- Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010). The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.