Cited by 24Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesHealthcare Systems and Technology

Unravelling Referral Paths Relating to the Dental Care of Children: A Study in Liverpool

Harris, Rebecca V, Pender, Susan M, Merry, Alison, Leo, Anthony·2008·Primary Dental Care

Abstract

Objective: To describe primary care referral networks relating to children's dental care and the main influences on referral decisions taken by dentists working in a primary care setting. Design: A postal questionnaire to all 130 general dental practitioners (GDPs) in contract with Primary Care Trusts (PCTs), and 24 Community Dental Service (CDS) dentists in Liverpool. Outcome measures: Characteristics of patient groups and factors influencing the choice of referral pathway of children referred from primary dental care. Results: There were good responses rates (110 [85%] GDPs and 22 [92%] CDS dentists). The two main reasons why GDPs referred children to hospitals were (a) for treatment under general anaesthetic (GA) or relative analgesia (RA) and (b) for restorative care of dentally anxious children. GDPs also referred anxious children requiring simple restorative care and/or RA to the CDS. Only eight GDPs (7%) cited a lack of experience as a reason for referral of dentally anxious children for simple restorative care, compared to 53 (48%) who cited a lack of RA facilities, and 25 (23%) who cited financial considerations. Conclusions: GDPs refer children to both hospital services and the CDS, and identify a lack of RA facilities and economic pressures as key reasons for referral.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1308/135576108784000294

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, R. V., Pender, S. M., Merry, A., & Leo, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Liverpool Primary Care Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Venue
Primary Dental Care
Published
2008-04
Volume
os15
Issue
2
Pages
45-52
ISSN
  • 1355-7610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-9344
OpenAlex
W2035731910
Cited by
24
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Primary Dental Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
children's dental care, referral pathways, general dentists, community dental care, general anesthesia, relative analgesia, restorative care, referral decisions, financial barriers to care, Liverpool
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Dental, Anesthesia, General, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Clinical Competence, Community Dentistry, Decision Making, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dental Service, Hospital, England, Female, General Practice, Dental, Humans, Male, Pediatric Dentistry, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Tooth Extraction, Procedural Sedation, Dental Anxiety, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review