Cited by 35Genetic factors in colorectal cancerWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Somatic Mutations in Familial Adenomatous Polyps: Nuclear Translocation of β-Catenin Requires More Than Biallelic APC Inactivation

Open access
Bläker, Hendrik, Scholten, Martin, Sutter, Christian, Otto, Herwart F., Penzel, Roland·2003·American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

Germline mutations of the APC gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP). APC inactivation results in dysregulation of wnt/wingless signaling and contributes to chromosomal instability in vitro. To investigate somatic alterations that follow a known germline mutation and contribute to the transition from normal to neoplastic mucosa, we studied 10 adenomatous polyps from a 27-year-old patient with an APC germline mutation at codon 554. Chromosomal imbalances were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization; APC and K-ras were screened for somatic mutations. Before DNA analysis, the polyps were bisected to compare the genetic alterations with the corresponding immunohistologic phenotype of β-catenin, a proto-oncogene product degraded by the APC tumor suppressor. Gains at chromosome 20 were the most frequent chromosomal alterations (6 polyps). Losses were found predominantly at chromosome 4q (3 polyps). A K-ras mutation was seen in 1 polyp, while all polyps displayed somatic intragenic APC mutations. Comparative immunohistologic analysis revealed strong membranous staining for β-catenin in all adenomatous polyps, but only 1 adenoma showed nuclear accumulation. Our results suggest chromosomal aberrations contribute early to the progression of adenomatous polyps after biallelic APC inactivation. APC inactivation itself is insufficient for immunohistochemically detectable nuclear translocation of β-catenin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1309/4e4wg3aygjncd11p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accepted causal relationship between mutated APC, dysregulated Wnt signaling, proliferation and colorectal cancer development does not hold at least during the earliest stages of malignant transformation.

    “improved diagnostic tools and better access to early lesions have found that this is not the case, at least during the earliest stages of malignant transformation [6–8]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bläker, H., Scholten, M., Sutter, C., Otto, H. F., & Penzel, R.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Published
2003-09
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
418-423
ISSN
  • 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7722
OpenAlex
W3198353739
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
familial adenomatous polyposis, APC gene, somatic mutations, adenomatous polyps, chromosomal instability, KRAS mutation, β-catenin, nuclear translocation, Wnt signaling, tumor suppressor inactivation, colorectal adenoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review