The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entwicklung des Fragebogens »ICD-10-Symptom-Rating« (ISR)
Abstract
Objectives Construction of the newly developed "ICD-10 Symptom Rating" (ISR) is presented together with some statistical data. This questionnaire is founded on the well-known ICD-10, according to which symptoms are relevant for assessing psychological disorders. The ISR aims at a comprehensive evaluation of the severity of psychological disorders. The ISR 2.0 has 29 items and six syndrome scales: Depression, Anxiety, Obsessive/Compulsive, Somatoform, Eating Disorders, and the Supplementary Scale, which covers a variety of syndromes, as well as a total score. Methods and results In a first cross-validation with 108 patients, some rather high correlations were found between the SCL-90-R and the ISR. They ranged from r = 0.78 to 0.37 for the individual syndrome scales, and amounted to r = 0.78 for the GSI versus the total score.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ICD-10 Symptom Rating (ISR; Tritt et al., 2008) is a well evaluated self-rating screening instrument for a wide variety of psychological syndromes.”
From A clinical effectiveness trial comparing ACT and CBT for inpatients with depressive and mixed mental disorders (2021) · cites this paper as Tritt et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
Øksenholt, S., & Lienert, G. A. (1962) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/319992 · Cited by 1,027
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Kepecs, J. G. (1980) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1980.34.1.131 · Cited by 965
Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)“
Gräfe, K., Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., & Löwe, B. (2004) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.171 · Cited by 805
Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion
Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2008) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71635-8 · Cited by 349
Psychologische Diagnostik in der integrierten Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie
Fliege, H. (2006) · Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver · doi:10.17169/refubium-11586 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Fragestellung, Nach einer Darstellung der Konstruktionsschritte werden die Fragebogenneuentwicklung „ICD-10-Symptom-Rating
- Becker J., 2005, Standardisierte Diagnosefindung: Computergestützte (CIDI) - versus klinische Diagnosestellungen an einer psychosomatischen Stichprobe. Psychother Psychosom med Psychol 58, 5-14
- Bühner M., 2004, Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion
- Dilling H., 1993, Kapitel V (F): klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien
- Franke G., 1995, SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis. Göttingen
- Henningsen P., 2002, Somatoforme Störungen. Leitlinien und Quelltexte
- Herzog T., 2000, Qualitätsmanagement in Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik
- Knappe S., 2008, Diagnostik psychischer Störungen: „Gold-
- Lienert A., 1998, Testaufbau und Testanalyse
- Tritt K., 2007, Qualitätssicherung mit Benchmarking in der stationären Psychosomatik. Psychotherapie im Dialog 1, 74-78
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Choi, S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, K. F., & Cella, D. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0035768 · Cited by 480
Wahl, I., Löwe, B., Bjørner, J. B., Fischer, F. H., Langs, G., Voderholzer, U., Aita, S. A., Bergemann, N., Brähler, E., & Rose, M. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.019 · Cited by 193
Obbarius, N., Fischer, F., Liegl, G., Obbarius, A., & Rose, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584333 · Cited by 138
Bernburg, M., Vitzthum, K., Groneberg, D. A., & Mache, S. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011369 · Cited by 152
Long-term patient-related quality of life after fracture-related infections of the long bones
Walter, N., Rupp, M., Hierl, K., Pfeifer, C., Kerschbaum, M., Hinterberger, T., & Alt, V. (2021) · Bone and Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.105.bjr-2020-0532 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Tritt, K., von Heymann, F., Zaudig, M., Zacharias, I., Söllner, W., & Loew, T.
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-418
- ISSN
- 1438-3608 (ISSN-L)
- 2196-8349
- OpenAlex
- W1910281172
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (submittedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- questionnaire development, depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, somatoform symptoms, eating disorders, cross-validation, SCL-90-R, psychometric properties
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Somatoform Disorders, Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
