Cited by 123Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entwicklung des Fragebogens »ICD-10-Symptom-Rating« (ISR)

Tritt, Karin, von Heymann, Friedrich, Zaudig, Michael, Zacharias, Irina, Söllner, Wolfgang, Loew, Thomas·2008·Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie

Abstract

Objectives Construction of the newly developed "ICD-10 Symptom Rating" (ISR) is presented together with some statistical data. This questionnaire is founded on the well-known ICD-10, according to which symptoms are relevant for assessing psychological disorders. The ISR aims at a comprehensive evaluation of the severity of psychological disorders. The ISR 2.0 has 29 items and six syndrome scales: Depression, Anxiety, Obsessive/Compulsive, Somatoform, Eating Disorders, and the Supplementary Scale, which covers a variety of syndromes, as well as a total score. Methods and results In a first cross-validation with 108 patients, some rather high correlations were found between the SCL-90-R and the ISR. They ranged from r = 0.78 to 0.37 for the individual syndrome scales, and amounted to r = 0.78 for the GSI versus the total score.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13109/zptm.2008.54.4.409

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Fragestellung, Nach einer Darstellung der Konstruktionsschritte werden die Fragebogenneuentwicklung „ICD-10-Symptom-Rating
  2. Becker J., 2005, Standardisierte Diagnosefindung: Computergestützte (CIDI) - versus klinische Diagnosestellungen an einer psychosomatischen Stichprobe. Psychother Psychosom med Psychol 58, 5-14
  3. Bühner M., 2004, Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion
  4. Dilling H., 1993, Kapitel V (F): klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien
  5. Franke G., 1995, SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis. Göttingen
  6. Henningsen P., 2002, Somatoforme Störungen. Leitlinien und Quelltexte
  7. Herzog T., 2000, Qualitätsmanagement in Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik
  8. Knappe S., 2008, Diagnostik psychischer Störungen: „Gold-
  9. Lienert A., 1998, Testaufbau und Testanalyse
  10. Tritt K., 2007, Qualitätssicherung mit Benchmarking in der stationären Psychosomatik. Psychotherapie im Dialog 1, 74-78

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tritt, K., von Heymann, F., Zaudig, M., Zacharias, I., Söllner, W., & Loew, T.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
409-418
ISSN
  • 1438-3608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8349
OpenAlex
W1910281172
Cited by
123
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (submittedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
questionnaire development, depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, somatoform symptoms, eating disorders, cross-validation, SCL-90-R, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychometrics, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Somatoform Disorders, Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review