Cited by 76Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validierung der Messung gesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität mittels des Short-Form-Health-Survey-12 (SF-12 Version 2.0) in einer deutschen Normstichprobe

Open access
Drixler, Karin, Morfeld, Matthias, Glaesmer, Heide, Brähler, Elmar, Wirtz, Markus Antonius·2020·Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie

Abstract

Summary Validation of the Short-Form-Health-Survey-12 (SF-12 Version 2.0) assessing health-related quality of life in a normative German sample Objectives: Convergent and divergent validation of the Short-Form-Health-Survey-12 assessing HRQoL by analyzing its associations with depressiveness (PHQ-9), social support (OSS-3) and satisfaction with life (SWLS). Methods: A normative German sample (N = 2.524) was analyzed using correlation, regression as well as confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling for ordinal data. Results: The SF-12-scale Mental Health is associated most strongly with the validation criteria (PHQ: r[scales/constructs] = −.73/−.88, OSS-3: r = .35/.55, SWLS: r = .47/.62). Mental Health (β = .36) and Social Support (OSS-3; β = .25) allow to explain a significant amount of variance of the SWLS (R2 = .28). On construct level Emotional Role Functioning (β = .28) proved to be significant additionally. Conclusions: The SF-12 scales are associated with the validation criteria as expected. The SF- 12 proved to be suitable for modelling core components of HRQoL within a biopsychosocial framework aiming at predicting satisfaction with life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13109/zptm.2020.66.3.272

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Andersen H. A., 2007, Z Wirt Soz, 127, 171
  2. Boosma A., 2001, Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., Sörbom, D. (Hg.): Structural equation modeling: Present and future, 139
  3. Damásio B. F., 2015, Psychometric properties of the Brazilian 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12v2). Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 25, 29-37
  4. Kocalevent R. D., 2014, Psychologische und sozialwissenschaftliche Kurzskalen: Standardisierte Erhebungsinstrumente für Wissenschaft und Praxis, 216
  5. Kontodimopoulos N., 2007, Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5, doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-55 · DOI
  6. Matsunaga M., 2010, Psychosocial functioning in patients with treatment-resistant depression after group cognitive behavioral therapy. BMC Psychiatry 10, doi:10.1186/1471-244X-10-22 · DOI
  7. Maurischat C., 2008, Psychol Sci Q, 50, 7
  8. Montazeri A., 2009, The Iranian version of 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC Public Health 9, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-341 · DOI
  9. Morfeld M., 2011, SF-36. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe
  10. Romppel M., 2017, Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a German and a Colombian population sample. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, doi:10.1002/mpr.1532 · DOI
  11. Schermelleh-Engel K., 2003, MPROnline, 8, 23
  12. Scholz M., 2014, Rehabilitation, 53, 118
  13. WHO, 1946, Verfassung der Weltgesundheitsorganisation. Genf: WHO

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Drixler, K., Morfeld, M., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., & Wirtz, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Education Freiburg (DE)
  • Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
272-286
ISSN
  • 1438-3608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8349
OpenAlex
W3082735495
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
health-related quality of life, psychometric validation, depression, social support, life satisfaction, mental health, emotional role functioning, biopsychosocial model
MeSH terms
Germany, Health Surveys, Humans, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review