The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extractivism and its socio-environmental impact in South America. Overview of the “lithium triangle”
Open accessAbstract
This article aims to give an overview of the socio-environmental impacts of the extractive process in South America. Half of all lithium reserves on the planet are located between Chile, Argentina and Bolivia, the so-called “lithium triangle”. Lands where the transformation process is often opposed by local organizations that attempt a dialectic of negotiation/resistance of a territory harming communities and damaging fragile ecosystems. The exploitation of local water resources caused by the mining process has a strong impact on ancestral territories. Water resources are contaminated, diverted and consumed by the lithium mining process causing conflicts and exacerbating the long process of expropriation of local communities. The displacement of populations, forced by the intensive development of mining activities, leaves the population in a very high position of vulnerability. In these territories, the objective must be (1) to adapt local infrastructures to the new technological needs of the sector (eg. green technologies), (2) to focus on projects that benefit the local community both socially and environmentally.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The opportunity cost of this disruption has been described and analyzed from a social [21,103,106] and environmental perspective [65,107,108].”
From The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats (2025) · cites this paper as [103]
In the citing paper
“At the same time, information on water consumption in the EIRs, when available, is frequently too technical for civil society and decision-makers to understand [102] or for small, usually poor local governments to audit or verify the information provided [103].”
From The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats (2025) · cites this paper as [103]
In the citing paper
“Lithium mining operations in the salars have received criticism for their socio-environmental impacts (Giglio, 2021) and concerns regarding damage to the ecosystem in the region (Flexer et al., 2018).”
From Life cycle environmental impacts of current and future battery-grade lithium supply from brine and spodumene (2022) · cites this paper as Giglio, 2021
Citations
Cites
Liu, W., Agusdinata, D. B., & Myint, S. W. (2019) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2019.04.016 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chordia, M., Wickerts, S., Nordelöf, A., & Arvidsson, R. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106634 · Cited by 114
Díaz Paz, W. F., Seghezzo, L., Salas Barboza, A. G., Escosteguy, M., Arias-Alvarado, P. V., Kruse, E., Hufty, M., & Iribarnegaray, M. A. (2025) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42523 · Cited by 13
“The opportunity cost of this disruption has been described and analyzed from a social [21,103,106] and environmental perspective [65,107,108].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Giglio, E.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Giglio, Elena
- Venue
- América Crítica
- Publisher
- América Crítica
- Published
- 2021-10-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-53
- OpenAlex
- W3205945967
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
- Keywords
- extractivism, lithium mining, lithium triangle, socio-environmental impacts, water conflicts, water pollution, water diversion, indigenous territories, community displacement, forced displacement, community vulnerability, land expropriation, mining resistance, environmental technology, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extractivism and its socio-environmental impact in South America. Overview of the “lithium triangle”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13125/americacritica/4926
- The paper
- Giglio, E. (2021). Extractivism and its socio-environmental impact in South America. Overview of the “lithium triangle”. América Crítica. https://doi.org/10.13125/americacritica/4926