Biodiversity of Gola Forest, Sierra Leone
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple years of extensive ecological surveys in the transboundary Lofa-Gola-Mano forest complex yielded relatively few pygmy hippo signs within protected areas compared to community-managed areas and former agricultural sites.
“Additionally, multiple years of extensive ecological surveys in the transboundary Lofa-Gola-Mano forest complex of Liberia and Sierra Leone yielded relatively few pygmy hippo signs within protected areas compared to the number of signs recorded in community-managed areas and former agricultural sites (Garteh, 2013; Hillers et al., 2017; Klop et al., 2008).”
From Fine-scale habitat requirements of the pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis): Implications for rainforest conservation in West Africa (2026) · cites this paper as Klop et al., 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kempkes, J. B., Si, Y., van ’t Zelfde, M., Digbeu, H. E. O., Bogui, E. B., Ouattara, K., Koné, I., & Paris, M. (2026) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04346
- Authors
- Klop, E., Lindsell, J., & Siaka, A.
- ORCID
- Lindsell, Jeremy
- Venue
- The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
- Publisher
- The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W6922444548
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- biodiversity, tropical rainforest, forests, species diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
