CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 508Digital literacy in educationLiteracy, Media, and EducationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding.

Ala-Mutka, Kirsti·2011·European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
DOI 10.13140/rg.2.2.18046.00322
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.13140/rg.2.2.18046.00322

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 508

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ala-Mutka, K.
Corresponding author
Ala-Mutka, Kirsti
ORCID
Ala-Mutka, Kirsti
Venue
European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
Publisher
European Commission, JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies
Published
2011
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.18046.00322
OpenAlex
W1750352205
Cited by
508
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
34.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
digital skills, conceptual framework, competency mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review