Syppre: better reconciliation of global and local issues through innovative and diversified cropping systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Syppre deals with annual arable crops and seeks to test innovative cropping system strategies that diversify the crop through introducing oilseed and protein crops into the rotation.
“Syppre deals with annual arable crops and seeks to test innovative cropping system strategies that diversify the crop through introducing oilseed and protein crops into the rotation.”
From Performance of innovative cropping systems diversified with oilseeds and protein crops: identification and resolution of methodological issues, using the Syppre experimental network as a case study (2024) · cites this paper as Tauvel et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Combining diversification practices to enhance the sustainability of conventional cropping systems
Viguier, L., Cavan, N., Bockstaller, C., Cadoux, S., Corre-Hellou, G., Dubois, S., Duval, R., Keichinger, O., Toqué, C., Toupet de Cordoue, A.-L., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationLongis, S., Cadoux, S., Toupet de Cordoue, A.-L., Tauvel, P., Estienne, M., Onzon, P., Lescourret, F., Rouillon, C., & Aubertot, J.-N. (2024) · OCL · doi:10.1051/ocl/2023022 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tauvel, P., Cordoue, D., Cadoux, S., Duval, R., Toqué, C., & Tailleur, A.
- Venue
- Unpublished
- Publisher
- Unpublished
- Published
- 2019
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
