Cited by 61Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsPlant and soil sciences

Combining diversification practices to enhance the sustainability of conventional cropping systems

Open access
Viguier, Loïc, Cavan, Nicolas, Bockstaller, Christian, Cadoux, Stéphane, Corre-Hellou, Guénaëlle, Dubois, Sophie, Duval, Rémy, Keichinger, Olivier +3 more·2021·European Journal of Agronomy

Abstract

A major path helping agriculture achieve the dual challenges of production and environmental preservation, consists of transitioning from the current, external input-based, conventional farming systems to a biodiversity-based agricultural system that rely more on ecosystem services. One lever of this transition consists of diversifying agri-food systems using practices such as rotation extension, intercropping (IC), multiple cropping or multi-services cover crops (MSCC) implementation. Here, we investigated to what extent the combination of diversification practices could contribute to the enhancement of the sustainability of current conventional cropping systems through an ex ante evaluation. We compared the sustainability performances of five diversified (DIV) cropping systems from five major arable crop production regions of France to their local less diversified reference (REF) systems by calculating various criteria and implementing a multi-criteria decision aid model. 76 criteria assessing the three dimensions of sustainability were calculated (10, 17 and 49 criteria for the economic, social and environmental dimensions respectively). Our analysis showed that the combination of diversification practices could improve the environmental performances while maintaining a priori economic and social performances at satisfactory levels according to the local expert working group. The DIV systems always had lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to their REF systems and often improved air and water quality and above- and belowground biodiversity. However, diversification may also cause drawbacks for some indicators, as negative impacts were observed from, gross margin, NO3 lixiviation, NH3 volatilization or pesticide use, in some cases. Our analysis also suggested that the effect of a combination of diversification practices on an indicator can be either positive or negative according to the pedo-climatic context, the level of performance of the reference and compromises in the management of diversification practices in response to local objectives of performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. De Cordoue, A., Cadoux, S., Toqué, C., Pierson, P., Duval, R., Tailleur, A., Flenet, F., Angevin, F., Gate, P., 2016. In: European Society of Agronomy (Ed.), Co-Design of Agro-Ecological Cropping Systems Combining Global and Local Issues. 14th ESA Congress, Edinburgh, pp. 1-2.
  2. Thibault, C., Cavan, N., Labreuche, J., Métais, P., Angevin, F., 2018. Multicriteria Assessment of the Effects of Tillage Practices on Cropping Systems: Development of the Decision Support Tool DEXiSol. 21st ISTRO international conference. In: International Soil Tillage Research Organization. Paris, pp. 92-93. In: https://www. istro.org/index.php/publications/proceedings.
  3. Toqué, C., Cadoux, S., Pierson, P., Duval, R., Toupet, A., Carroué, B., Angevin, F., Gate, P., 2015. SYPPRE: a project to promote innovations in arable crop production mobilizing farmers and stakeholders and including co-design, ex-ante evaluation and experimentation of multi-service farming systems matching with regional challenges. In: 5th International Symposium for Farming Systems Design. Montpellier, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viguier, L., Cavan, N., Bockstaller, C., Cadoux, S., Corre-Hellou, G., Dubois, S., Duval, R., Keichinger, O., Toqué, C., Toupet de Cordoue, A.-L., & Angevin, F.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Terres Inovia (FR)
  • Arvalis - Institut du Végétal (FR)
Corresponding author
Angevin, Frédérique
Venue
European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
127
Pages
126279
ISSN
1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157301457
Cited by
61
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (727482, ANR-14-CE18-007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
Keywords
crop diversification, conventional cropping systems, sustainability assessment, multicriteria decision aid, intercropping, cover crops, multiple cropping, greenhouse gas emissions, nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization, pesticide use, biodiversity, arable agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review