Polarización política en Twitter
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alcatruz (2018) examina la polarización política en Twitter en Chile en torno a candidatos presidenciales y al debate presidencial transmitido por ANATEL, con escasos puentes entre los grupos, aun cuando las redes sean formadas ad-hoc en torno a una etiqueta compartida.
“En el caso de Chile,Alcatruz (2018) examina la polarización política en Twitter, en torno a candidatos presidenciales específicos que en su discurso apelan a la polarización, pero también en torno al debate presidencial transmitido a todo el país por la asociación de canales de televisión de Chile, la ANATEL, Asociación nacional de televisión, con escasos puentes entre los grupos, aun cuando las”
From “Vital testimonio confirm󔦔: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter (2021) · cites this paper as Alcatruz (2018)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Vital testimonio confirm󔦔: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter
Santos, M. L. B., Jaramillo Castro, O., & Aguirre, D. (2021) · Cuadernos.info · doi:10.7764/cdi.49.27509 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alcatruz, D.
- Corresponding author
- Alcatruz, Daniel
- Venue
- Unpublished
- Publisher
- Unpublished
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W6922627631
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- political polarization, Twitter, social media, online political discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
