The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Dinamica rituală a tradițiilor de peste an (Tradiții emblematice ale etniilor din Dobrogea de Nord)
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, different domains correspond to different languages, such as: Slavonic for religious worship, dialect speech for everyday life, the language of a neighboring people for external communication (Chiselev, 2019).”
From An Incursion into the Folklore of the Lipovan Russians from the Danube Delta (2023) · cites this paper as Chiselev, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Incursion into the Folklore of the Lipovan Russians from the Danube Delta
National Academy of Music ”Gheorghe Dima”, P. N. E., & STOIAN-IRIMIE, D. (2023) · Ethnomousikologion · doi:10.47809/etm.2023.01.04
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiselev, A.
- Corresponding author
- Chiselev, Alexandru
- ORCID
- Chiselev, Alexandru
- Venue
- Ed. Ex Ponto
- Publisher
- Ed. Ex Ponto
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W4313549331
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- ro
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › European Linguistics and Anthropology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Arts and Performance Studies
- Keywords
- ritual dynamics, folk customs, ethnic traditions, religious festivals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
