The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Access to Family Medicine in Quebec through Quotas and Numerical Targets
Open accessAbstract
Despite various health reforms over the last 20 years, access to primary care remained stagnant in Québec, and in 2014 the province had the highest proportion of residents in Canada without a family physician.In November 2014, the Québec Minister of Health and Social Services introduced Bill 20, An Act to promote access to family medicine and specialized medicine services and to amend various legislative provisions relating to assisted procreation.Bill 20 aimed to increase access to family medicine through a system of quotas of registered patients and penalties for family physicians.Health system user support groups and the governmental advisory group on women's rights supported Bill 20's approach to ensure the rights of system users to access family physicians.However, the union of general practitioners was strongly against the bill due to the clash between the minister's reliance on numbers and the realities of family practice.The union of general practitioners entered negotiations with the minister and while Bill 20 was legalized in 2015, it was agreed that family physicians would be excused from the bill as long as they reached two targets at the end of December 2017: 1) 85% of Québecers must have a family doctor and 2) family doctors must ensure the patients registered to them see them, and not other doctors, 80% of the time.The targets were not met at the end of December 2017 but the quota system in Bill 20 has yet to be implemented. Improving Access to Family Medicine in QuébecLee & Quesnel-Vallée la fin de décembre 2017, le système de quotas prévu dans le projet de loi 20 n'a pas encore été mis en œuvre. Key Messages• Family physicians strongly opposed Bill 20, notably due to its focus on performance metrics that did not sufficiently factor in the structural constraints on family practice in Québec.• As of 25 August 2019, Bill 20's system of quotas and penalties for family physicians has yet to come into effect.• It has been suggested that Bill 20's proposal to establish patient quotas for family physicians may have served as a negotiation tool for Québec's Minister of Health and Social Services. Messages-clés• Les médecins de famille se sont fortement opposés au projet de loi 20, notamment en raison de l'emphase mise sur les indicateurs de performance qui ne tenaient pas suffisamment compte des contraintes structurelles de la pratique de médecine de famille au Québec.• En date du 25 septembre 2019, le système de quotas et de pénalités pour les médecins de famille proposé dans la loi 20 n'est toujours pas encore entré en vigueur.• D'aucuns ont suggéré que la proposition du projet de loi 20 visant à établir des quotas de patients pour les médecins de famille n'était en fait qu'un outil de négociation pour le ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pineault, R., Silva, R. B. D., Provost, S., Breton, M., Tousignant, P., Fournier, M., Prud’homme, A., & Lévesque, J. (2016) · International Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.1155/2016/8938420 · Cited by 15
Quesnel‐Vallée, A., & Carter, R. (2018) · Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v6i1.3216 · Cited by 12
Self-citationEffects of primary care reform in Quebec on access to primary health care services
Dunkley-Hickin, C. (2014) · doi:10.82308/4538 · Cited by 10
de Sherbrooke, U., Breton, M., Smithman, M. A., de Sherbrooke, U., Vandesrasier, A., de Sherbrooke, U., Kreindler, S. A., Sasseville, M., de Sherbrooke, U., Sutherland, J. M., et al. (2019) · Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v7i1.3773 · Cited by 9
Implementing Centralized Waiting Lists for Patients without a Family Physician in Quebec
Breton, M., Gagne, J., & Gankpe, F. (2014) · Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.02.01.05 · Cited by 5
Quebec reforms: necessary or overkill?
Young, H. (2015) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-5052 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Dufresne S. 2015. Le CSF fait du tort aux femmes. Le Devoir, 4 March. https://www. ledevoir.com/opinion/libre-opinion/433396/le-csf-fait-du-tort-aux-femmes FMOQ (Fédération des médecins omnipraticiens du Québec). 2013. Working group re- port on access to primary care. https://fmoq-legacy.s3.amazonaws.com/en/Union% 20Affairs/President's%20Office/Letters/EN-Rapport-acessibilite-2013-11-11.pdf
- Gladu F-P. 2007. Perceived shortage of family doctors in Quebec: can we do something about it? Canadian Family Physician 53(11): 1858-1860.
- Vigie.Bll.DocumentGenerique_105133&process=Original&token=ZyMoxNwUn8ikQ+ TRKYwPCjWrKwg+vIv9rjij7p3xLGTZDmLVSmJLoqe/vG7/YWzz MSSS (Ministry of Health and Social Services). 2017a. Accès à un médecin de famille-la Grande Inscription. Bulletin of the Minister, 25 October. http://www.msss.gouv.qc. ca/ministere/salle-de-presse/communique-1415/
- MSSS (Ministry of Health and Social Services). 2017b. 1 million de personnes de plus ont maintenant accès à un médecin de famille. Bulletin of the Minister, 20 December. http://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/ministere/salle-de-presse/communique-1461
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smithman, M. A., Haggerty, J., Gaboury, I., & Breton, M. (2022) · BMC Primary Care · doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01850-4 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- McGill University, Lee, G. E., Quesnel-Vallée, A., & McGill University
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Lee, Ga Eun
- Venue
- Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé
- Published
- 2019-10-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2291-6369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979447681
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Keywords
- primary care access, numerical targets, general practitioners, performance indicators, health policy, physician unions, Quebec health system, health care reform, women's rights, physician-patient relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Access to Family Medicine in Quebec through Quotas and Numerical Targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13162/hro-ors.v7i4.3886
- The paper
- McGill University, Lee, G. E., Quesnel-Vallée, A., & McGill University. (2019). Improving Access to Family Medicine in Quebec through Quotas and Numerical Targets. Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé. https://doi.org/10.13162/hro-ors.v7i4.3886