Cited by 5Educational Assessment and ImprovementData Visualization and AnalyticsEducational Research and Methods

Data Systems and Reports as Active Participants in Data Interpretation

Open access
Rankin, Jenny Grant·2016·Universal Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

Most data-informed decision-making in education is undermined by flawed interpretations. Educator-driven interventions to improve data use are beneficial but not omnipotent, as data misunderstandings persist at schools and school districts commended for ideal data use support. Meanwhile, most data systems and reports display figures without supporting guidance concerning the data's proper interpretation, and data reports often do not reflect best design practices for effective communication of data. Yet there are strong evidence data systems and reports, if modified to adhere to research-based best practices, can play an active role in supporting understanding of the data and appropriate use of the data. This paper features examples of how Over-the-Counter Data Standards can be applied to data systems and reports in order to report data to educators in ways most likely to render appropriate interpretation. These standards are derived from a quantitative study of 211 educators and a qualitative study of over 300 studies and other expert sources investigating how to best improve data systems and reports. This paper's examples involve enhancing data with labels, supplemental documentation, a help system, effective package/display, and adequate content. Educators' data interpretations were 205 to 436 percent more accurate depending on the standard applied to their data reporting tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13189/ujer.2016.041101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rankin, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Rankin, Jenny Grant
Venue
Universal Journal of Educational Research
Published
2016-11
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
2493-2501
ISSN
  • 2332-3205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2332-3213
OpenAlex
W2547920411
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Universal Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
educational information systems, data reports, data interpretation, data-informed decision making, data visualization, data transmission, data annotation, help systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review