Cited by 36Pharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Pharmacists in federally qualified health centers: models of care to improve chronic disease.

Open access
Rodis, Jennifer L., Capesius, Traci R., Rainey, Julie T., Awad, Magdi H., Fox, Carrie Hornbeck·2019·Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ) control (≤9%) and 3) blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg). METHODS: We evaluated MTM provided by pharmacists in 10 FQHCs in Ohio through qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with pharmacists and FQHC leadership and aggregate reporting of clinical markers. RESULTS: ≤9%, and 79% (n = 758 of 959) achieved blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Through this statewide collaborative, access for patients in FQHCs to MTM by pharmacists increased. The factors we identified that facilitate MTM practice models can be used to enhance the models to achieve clinical goals. Collaboration among clinic staff and community partners can improve models of care and improve chronic disease outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5888/pcd16.190163

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There remains limited integration of clinical pharmacists in community settings due to lack of reimbursement, clinician acceptance, time, and resources.

    “However, there remains limited integration of clinical pharmacists in community settings due to lack of reimbursement, clinician acceptance, time, and resources.8”
  • Few randomized studies of medication management services have involved underserved communities and FQHCs, rigorously evaluated clinical outcomes, or had follow-up beyond 12 months.

    “However, few randomized studies of medication management services have involved underserved communities and FQHCs, rigorously evaluated clinical outcomes,8 or had follow-up beyond 12 months.55”

    From Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    Citation 55 is attached to the claim that few randomized medication-management studies had follow-up beyond 12 months. The Introduction says evidence on outcomes in FQHCs is sparse, but it does not address the number or follow-up duration of randomized studies. The Methods give dates for this project's phases, not evidence about follow-up in randomized studies. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]The patient-centered medical home: integrating comprehensive medication management to optimize patient outcomes. Second edition; June 2012. https://www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/files/media/medmanagement.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2019.
  2. [21]Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
  3. [22]Charmaz K. Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-Biber SN and Leavy P, editors. Handbook of emergent methods. New York (NY): The Guildford Press; 2008:155–172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodis, J. L., Capesius, T. R., Rainey, J. T., Awad, M. H., & Fox, C. H.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Professional Data Analysts, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
  • Ohio Department of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rodis, Jennifer L.
Venue
Preventing Chronic Disease
Published
2019-11-21
Volume
16
Pages
E153-E153
ISSN
1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987063507
Cited by
36
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U58 DP004820)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
federally qualified health centers, models of care, chronic disease outcomes, blood pressure control, glycemic control, interprofessional collaboration, community health partnerships
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Facilities, Blood Pressure, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Patient Care, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Pharmacists, Professional Role, Medication Therapy Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review