Enabling others in social work: reflexivity and the theory of social domains
Open accessAbstract
This article sets out a framework to structure reflexivity in social work practice. It comprises five domains that impact on the individual and social life, namely (a) psychobiography – referring to a person’s unique experience throughout the lifecourse; (b) situated activity – highlighting the impact of everyday social interaction; (c) social settings – addressing the role of organisations in social life; (d) culture – covering the influence of attitudes, beliefs, tastes and ideas on symbolic meaning; and (e) politico-economy – alluding to the ramifications of political and economic forces on people’s lives. It is contended that power circulates throughout each domain as an enabling and constraining force. The article then outlines a process for using the reflexive framework in ‘enabling’ activities such as practice learning, supervision, mentoring and coaching. By applying the framework in these contexts, it is argued that social workers can reflect critically on their role and develop emancipatory forms of practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reflexivity is a crucial concept and pivotal in qualitative research methodology.
“Reflexivity is acknowledged as a crucial concept and is pivotal in the methodology of qualitative research.”
From Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research (2024) · cites this paper as Houston, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research
Ide, Y., & Beddoe, L. (2024) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250231173522 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Houston, S.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Houston, Stan
- Venue
- Critical and Radical Social Work
- Publisher
- Bristol University Press
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-260
- ISSN
- 2049-8608 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-8675
- OpenAlex
- W2518099065
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.qub.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Critical and Radical Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- reflexivity, social work practice, psychobiography, situated action, social environment, culture, power, enabling, practice learning, supervision, mentoring, coaching, emancipatory practice, life course
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review