The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients
Abstract
Objective: To systematically locate and review studies that have investigated the incidence of medication errors (MEs) in pediatric inpatients and identify common errors. Methods: A systematic search of studies related to MEs in children was performed using the following databases: MEDLINE (1951–April 2006), EMBASE (1966–April 2006), Pharm-line (1978–April 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–April 2006), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1982–April 2006), and British Nursing Index (1994–April 2006). Studies of the incidence and nature of MEs in pediatrics were included. The title, abstract, or full article was reviewed for relevance; any study not related to MEs in children was excluded. Results: Three methods were used to detect MEs in the studies reviewed: spontaneous reporting (n = 10), medication order or chart review (n = 14), or observation (n = 8). There was great variation in the definitions of ME used and the error rates reported. The most common type of ME was dosing error, often involving 10 times the actual dose required. Antibiotics and sedatives were the most common classes of drugs associated with MEs; these are probably among the most common drugs prescribed. Conclusions: Interpretation of the literature was hindered by variation in definitions employed by different researchers, varying research methods and setting, and a lack of theory-based research. Overall, it would appear that our initial concern about MEs in pediatrics has been validated; however, we do not know the actual size of the problem. Further work to determine the incidence and causes of MEs in pediatrics is urgently needed, as well as evaluation of the best interventions to reduce them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Human error: models and management
Reason, J. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 · Cited by 5,665
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Pediatric Inpatients
Kaushal, R. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.16.2114 · Cited by 1,917
To err is human. Building a safer health system
Marano, C., Murianni, L., & Sticchi, L. (2005) · Italian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2427/5972 · Cited by 1,271
Donaldson, L. (2002) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.2-5-452 · Cited by 577
Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significance
Dean, B. (2002) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.11.4.340 · Cited by 419
Computerized Physician Order Entry and Medication Errors in a Pediatric Critical Care Unit
Potts, A. L., Barr, F. E., Gregory, D. F., Wright, L., & Patel, N. R. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.1.59 · Cited by 410
Medication Error Prevention by Clinical Pharmacists in Two Children's Hospitals
Folli, H. L., Poole, R. L., Benitz, W. E., & Russo, J. C. (1987) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.79.5.718 · Cited by 394
Fundamentals of medication error research
Allan, E. A., & Barker, K. N. (1990) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.1093/ajhp/47.3.555 · Cited by 354
Cited by
D'Errico, S., Zanon, M., Radaelli, D., Padovano, M., Santurro, A., Scopetti, M., Frati, P., & Fineschi, V. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.814100 · Cited by 108
Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
King, C. R., Abraham, J., Fritz, B. A., Cui, Z., Galanter, W., Chen, Y., & Kannampallil, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254358 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghaleb, M. A., Barber, N., Franklin, B. D., Yeung, V. W., Khaki, Z. F., & Wong, I. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1766-1776
- ISSN
- 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
- 1060-0280
- 1542-6270
- OpenAlex
- W2095925831
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Review of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1345/aph.1g717
- The paper
- Ghaleb, M. A., Barber, N., Franklin, B. D., Yeung, V. W., Khaki, Z. F., & Wong, I. C. (2006). Systematic Review of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1g717
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.