The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer and teacher perceptions
Abstract
Background. A small number of prior studies have found that victims of school bullying tend to exhibit poor social skills. Few of these have examined this issue from multiple perspectives, and there has been a focus on a restricted range of social skills. Aims. To determine the extent to which self, peers, and teachers regard victims as having poorer social skills than non‐victims across 20 behaviours/competencies. Sample. A convenience sample of 330 pupils aged between 9 and 11 years (162 girls and 168 boys) provided self‐report and peer‐report data. They were drawn from 12 classes from 6 junior schools in the UK. Additionally, 11 of the class teachers provided data. Method. Three separate methods were employed and in each case, participants were provided with 20 short statements that described a different social skill: (1) participants who were classified as either ‘victims’ or ‘non‐victims’ (using peer nominations) rated themselves on a 3‐point scale in terms of how like them each description was, (2) participants were asked to think of a victim and a non‐victim in their class and to rate both of these people on each description, and (3) teachers were asked to rate a previously identified victim and a non‐victim from their class on each description. Results. Using a direct discriminant function analysis of the self‐ratings, six of the social skills items were found to discriminate between victims and non‐victims, and the discriminant function was able to correctly classify 80% of the participants. For 18 of the items, peer ratings indicated significantly more pronounced social skills problems for victims than for non‐victims. Teacher ratings were significant for eight of the social skill items, and in each case, victims were rated as having greater problems. Conclusion. The finding that victims are perceived by three different sources to have poor social skills has important implications for interventions to support victims of bullying.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?
Stassen Berger, K. (2007) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 · Cited by 578
Trait emotional intelligence influences on academic achievement and school behaviour
Mavroveli, S., & Sánchez‐Ruiz, M. J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002009 · Cited by 247
Problematic internet use and mental health among British children and adolescents
El Asam, A., Samara, M., & Terry, P. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.007 · Cited by 164
Bundy, A. C., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Wyver, S., Baur, L., Schiller, W., Bauman, A., Engelen, L., Ragen, J., Luckett, T., et al. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-680 · Cited by 105
Habashy Hussein, M. (2013) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.702908 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-328
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2059175060
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer and teacher perceptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709905x25517
- The paper
- Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x25517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.