Cited by 40Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSocial Skills and Education

The social and emotional skills of bullies, victims, and bully–victims of Egyptian primary school children.

Habashy Hussein, Mohamed·2013·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

This study examined whether bullies, victims, bully-victims (who are both bullies and victims), and students who reported no or low levels of bullying and victimization differed in their levels of social and emotional skills. Data were collected from 623 children in fifth and sixth grades from four Egyptian elementary schools; their ages ranged from 10 to 12 years. K-means cluster analysis revealed four groups: bullies (n = 138), victims (n = 178), bully-victims (n = 59), and children who were not involved in bullying behaviour (n = 248). Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. The findings indicated that boys were more involved in bullying behaviour than girls, and both bullies and bully-victims were less likely to adhere to social rules and politeness than children who were not involved in bullying. Both bullies and victims were less aware of the physiological reactions of their emotions than uninvolved children, and were less able to apply social rules in social interaction. Both victims and bully-victims reported less likeability than children not involved in bullying. Verbal sharing, attending to others' emotions, and analysis of emotions did not have a statistically significant relationship with the probabilities of classifying children to any bullying group versus children not involved in bullying. Social skills were more important than emotional awareness in predicting the likelihood of classifying children in one of the three bullying groups versus…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207594.2012.702908

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habashy Hussein, M.
Affiliations
Department of Educational Psychology Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
910-921
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W2135130653
Cited by
40
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
bullying, bullying victims, bully-victims, social skills, emotional awareness, social rules, politeness, likeability, gender differences in bullying, elementary school students, Egyptian children, bullying intervention
MeSH terms
Child, Egypt, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Schools, Social Behavior, Students, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review