The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect
Abstract
It is known that pet dogs can act as catalysts for human social interactions, and it has been suggested that this may enhance feelings of well‐being. Two studies were carried out to establish the robustness of this effect. In Study 1, a highly trained dog was used to ensure that the dog itself did not solicit attention from passers‐by, and data were collected across a range of normal daily activities in which a dog could be included, not confined to conventional dog walking areas as in previous studies. Being accompanied by a dog increased the frequency of social interactions, especially interactions with strangers. In Study 2, also using a trained dog, a different (male) participant observer was dressed either smartly or scruffily. Although there were significantly more interactions when he was smartly dressed, the greatest effect was between the Dog present and No Dog conditions irrespective of the handler's dress. It is concluded that the social catalysis effect is very robust, which opens the way for investigating possible consequences of the effect for wellbeing and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Psychosocial Effects of a Companion Robot: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., & Broadbent, E. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 · Cited by 546
Pet ownership and human health: a brief review of evidence and issues
McNicholas, J., Gilbey, A., Rennie, A., Ahmedzai, S., Dono, J.-A., & Ormerod, E. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1252 · Cited by 442
Self-citationToward a psychology of human–animal relations.
Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038147 · Cited by 328
Companion Animals and Child/Adolescent Development: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Purewal, R., Christley, R., Kordas, K., Joinson, C., Meints, K., Gee, N., & Westgarth, C. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14030234 · Cited by 302
The human-companion animal bond: How humans benefit
Friedmann, E., & Son, H. (2009) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.015 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2011841878
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000712600161673
- The paper
- McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.