The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pre‐sleep cognitive activity: A comparison of sleep‐onset insomniacs and good sleepers
Abstract
Objective. Pre‐sleep cognitive activity has been implicated in the maintenance of sleep‐onset insomnia. The present study aimed to investigate the focus of attention, content and characteristics of cognition during the pre‐sleep period. Method. A semi‐structured clinician‐administered interview designed to index the content of pre‐sleep cognition was completed by individuals diagnosed with sleeponset insomnia ( N = 30) and good sleepers ( N = 30). Result. The pre‐sleep cognitive activity of insomniacs could be distinguished from that of good sleepers by being more focused on worries, problems and noises in the environment, and less focused on ‘nothing in particular’. In terms of content, the insomnia group were more likely to think about not sleeping or about something that had happened during the day. Insomniacs experienced their presleep cognitive activity as more occupying, less intentional, for a longer duration, and as causing more difficulty with sleep onset compared to good sleepers. Pre‐sleep imagery was reported at similar rates across diagnosis, but was more distressing and more likely to be associated with strong physical sensations for the insomniac group compared with the good sleeper group. Conclusion. The present study provides a comprehensive investigation of presleep cognitive activity and raises a number of areas for future research including monitoring of bodily sensations, imagery, problem‐solving and non‐active strategies in facilitating sleep onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421
Harvey, A. G. (2002) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00061-4 · Cited by 1,790
Self-citationKalmbach, D. A., Anderson, J. R., & Drake, C. L. (2018) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12710 · Cited by 620
“…reactive sleepers is consistent with prior evidence showing that rumination (a) is a cardinal feature of pre-sleep arousal (Baglioni et al., 2010; Harvey, 2000, 2002a; Pillai & Drake, 2014; Riemann et al., 2010, 2012), (b) is associated with sleep reactivity (Drake et al., 2013; Fern…”
BackgroundResultEspie, C. A. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135243 · Cited by 596
Lovato, N., & Gradisar, M. (2014) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2014.03.006 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Harvey, A. G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-286
- ISSN
- 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8260
- OpenAlex
- W2014225800
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pre‐sleep cognitive activity: A comparison of sleep‐onset insomniacs and good sleepers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/014466500163284
- The paper
- Harvey, A. G. (2000). Pre‐sleep cognitive activity: A comparison of sleep‐onset insomniacs and good sleepers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466500163284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.