Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pre‐sleep cognitive activity: A comparison of sleep‐onset insomniacs and good sleepers

Harvey, Allison G.·2000·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective. Pre‐sleep cognitive activity has been implicated in the maintenance of sleep‐onset insomnia. The present study aimed to investigate the focus of attention, content and characteristics of cognition during the pre‐sleep period. Method. A semi‐structured clinician‐administered interview designed to index the content of pre‐sleep cognition was completed by individuals diagnosed with sleeponset insomnia ( N = 30) and good sleepers ( N = 30). Result. The pre‐sleep cognitive activity of insomniacs could be distinguished from that of good sleepers by being more focused on worries, problems and noises in the environment, and less focused on ‘nothing in particular’. In terms of content, the insomnia group were more likely to think about not sleeping or about something that had happened during the day. Insomniacs experienced their presleep cognitive activity as more occupying, less intentional, for a longer duration, and as causing more difficulty with sleep onset compared to good sleepers. Pre‐sleep imagery was reported at similar rates across diagnosis, but was more distressing and more likely to be associated with strong physical sensations for the insomniac group compared with the good sleeper group. Conclusion. The present study provides a comprehensive investigation of presleep cognitive activity and raises a number of areas for future research including monitoring of bodily sensations, imagery, problem‐solving and non‐active strategies in facilitating sleep onset.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466500163284

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Harvey, A. G.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
275-286
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2014225800
Cited by
331
References
0
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.