Cited by 61Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Hopelessness and the anticipation of positive and negative future experiences in older parasuicidal adults

Conaghan, Susan, Davidson, Kate M.·2002·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined whether older people who were depressed or had engaged in parasuicidal behaviour could be identified by a decrease in positive future‐directed thinking in the absence of any increase in negative future‐directed thinking, in comparison with a community control group. Design: A mixed design was used that compared three groups (community controls, depressed controls and parasuicidal participants) in terms of future‐directed thinking (positive and negative), in relation to three future time periods (one week, one year and 5‐10 years). Methods: In all, 22 participants over 65 years of age, who had been admitted to hospital following a non‐fatal suicidal act, were compared with 22 older people being treated for depression and 22 older community volunteers who were not experiencing any significant psychological symptoms. The main measure was an adaptation of the traditional verbal fluency paradigm and attempted to quantify future‐directed thinking. Results: Parasuicidal and depressed participants showed decreased positive future thinking, but no increase in negative future thinking, in comparison with the community control group. Conclusions: The results confirm that older parasuicidal and older depressed participants are characterized by a reduction in positive anticipation and that this may be accounted for by depression rather than hopelessness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466502760379208

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors related to self-harm/non-fatal suicidal behavior were examined in six studies.

    “Factors related to self-harm/non-fatal suicidal behavior were examined in six studies [27,35,36,37,38,39].”
  • In a Scotland-based study, persons hospitalized for a non-fatal suicidal act were statistically significantly more often married than those in the community-based comparison group.

    “Conaghan observed that persons who were hospitalized in connection with a non-fatal suicidal act were statistically significantly more often married than those in the community-based comparison group [35].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conaghan, S., & Davidson, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Conaghan, Susan
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
233-242
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2030821671
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
hopelessness, depression, older adults
MeSH terms
Affect, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review